Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34442003›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Efficacy of Sirolimus Treatment in PEComa-10 Years of Practice Perspective.

Tomasz Świtaj, Aleksandra Sobiborowicz, Paweł Teterycz, Anna Klimczak, Donata Makuła, Michał Wągrodzki, Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz, Piotr Rutkowski, Anna M Czarnecka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. How I treat soft tissue sarcomas.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tomasz ŚwitajDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone, Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra SobiborowiczDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone, Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł TeteryczDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone, Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-714X
Anna KlimczakDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone, Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Donata MakułaDepartment of Radiology I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Michał WągrodzkiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-0736
Anna Szumera-CiećkiewiczDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr RutkowskiDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone, Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-5429
Anna M CzarneckaDepartment of Soft Tissue/Bone, Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-3810
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLInstytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) represent a family of rare mesenchymal tumors resultant from deregulation in mTOR pathway activity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term efficacy of targeted PEComa treatment. We reviewed all consecutive patients with PEComa who started systemic treatment with sirolimus in our reference sarcoma center between January 2011 and August 2020. Histopathology of PEComa was reviewed and confirmed in all cases by a designated sarcoma pathologist. Any surviving progression-free patients were censored at the last follow-up (31 March 2021). Survival curves were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test or a Cox proportional hazard model. Fifteen (12 females and 3 males) consecutive PEComa patients were treated. The median age of patients treated systemically was 50 years. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.8-NA) for first-line chemotherapy and was not reached (95% CI: 42.0-NA) for sirolimus as first-line therapy. There was one objective response (OR) in the chemotherapy group. The OR rate reached 73% (11/15 cases) for sirolimus regardless of the treatment line. All patients archived disease control. Three patients died due to disease progression after 55, 32, and 32 months since metastatic disease diagnosis. After a median follow-up of 55.7 (range: 3.2-220) months, the 5 yr OS was 65% (CI 95% 39-100). Our study is the largest single-institution report on PEComa systemic targeted therapy and fills the gap in the field of advanced PEComa care since the FDA/EMEA approval of sirolimus.

Indexed as

lymphangioleiomyomatosismTOR inhibitorsPEComaperivascular epithelioid cell tumorsarcomasirolimus

Identifiers

PMID34442003
PMCPMC8396894
OpenAlexW3193392971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.