Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441896›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Zygomatic Implants Placed in Immediate Function through Extra-Maxillary Surgical Technique and 45 to 60 Degrees Angulated Abutments for Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Extremely Atrophic Maxillae: Short-Term Outcome of a Retrospective Cohort.

Armando Lopes, Miguel de Araújo Nobre, Ana Ferro, Carlos Moura Guedes, Ricardo Almeida, Mariana Nunes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Indications for zygomatic implants: a systematic review.International journal of implant dentistry · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Assessment of different treatment alternatives for patients with total maxillectomy.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Armando LopesOral Surgery Department, Maló Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Piso 9, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.
Miguel de Araújo NobreResearch, Development and Education Department, Maló Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Piso 11, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7084-8301
Ana FerroOral Surgery Department, Maló Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Piso 9, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.
Carlos Moura GuedesProsthodontics Department, Maló Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Piso 10, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.
Ricardo AlmeidaProsthodontics Department, Maló Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Piso 10, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.
Mariana NunesOral Surgery Department, Maló Clinic, Avenida dos Combatentes, 43, Piso 9, 1600-042 Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

Nobel Biocare Services AG 2018-1593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of new devices for the rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxillae needs validation. We aimed to report the short-term outcome of severely atrophic jaws rehabilitated with zygomatic implants with no implant head angulation placed extramaxillary in conjunction with standard implants. Forty-four patients were consecutively included with 77 zygomatic implants (31 abutments of 45 degrees and 46 abutments of 60 degrees) and 115 standard implants. Outcome measures were prosthetic survival, implant/abutment success, complications, modified plaque index (mPLI), modified bleeding index (mBI), mucosal seal efficacy evaluation (MSEE) >4 mm, and Zygomatic implants classification level (ZICL). Two patients (4.5%) were lost to follow-up. No prosthesis was lost; one patient lost one zygomatic implant; two angulated abutments of 60 degrees needed to be replaced in one patient due to an aesthetic complaint; rendering a cumulative success rate at 2-years of 95.3% and 95.9% using patient and implant/abutment as unit of analysis, respectively. Mechanical and biological complications occurred in 13 and six patients, respectively; all resolved. The median mPLI and mBI was 1; MSEE > 4 mm occurred in 17% and 21% of patients at 1- and 2-years, respectively; ZICL1 was registered in 80% of patients. The current protocol enabled good short-term outcomes.

Indexed as

angulated abutmentsatrophic jawimmediate loadingmaxillazygomatic implants

Identifiers

PMID34441896
PMCPMC8397045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.