ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Shortening the Time of the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on Positive Blood Cultures with MALDI-TOF MS.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiplex RPA-CRISPR/Cas12a Assay for Rapid Detection of Class D OXA-Type Carbapenem-ResistantBiosensors · 2026Article
- Development of a Highly Specific RPA/CRISPR-Cas13a Assay for Detection ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Current Management of Infective Endocarditis: A Narrative Review Focused on Unmet Clinical Needs and the Multidisciplinary Approach.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Performance comparison and clinical validation of two rapid direct identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing approaches for pathogens isolated from positive blood cultures in children.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Antibiotic resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Impact of multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing in patients with bacteremia.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Short-term culture for rapid identification by mass spectrometry and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing from positive bottles.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Rapid Bacterial Identification from Positive Blood Cultures by MALDI-TOF MS Following Short-Term Incubation on Solid Media.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Sepsis among Neonates in a Ghanaian Tertiary Military Hospital: Culture Results and Turnaround Times.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Discrimination of Methicillin-resistantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current processes used in clinical microbiology laboratories take ~24 h for incubation to identify the bacteria after the blood culture has been confirmed as positive and fa further ~24 h to report the results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs). Patients with suspected bloodstream infection are treated with empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics but delayed targeted antimicrobial therapy. This study aimed to develop a method with a significantly shortened turnaround time for clinical application by identifying the optimal incubation period of a subculture. A total of 188 positive blood culture samples obtained from Nov. 2019 to Aug. 2020 were included. Compared to the conventional 24-h incubation for bacterial identification, our approach achieved 96.1% and 97.4% identification accuracy after shortening the incubation time to 4.5 and 3.5 h for gram-positive (GP) and gram-negative (GN) bacterial samples, respectively. Samples from short-term incubation without any intermediate step or process were directly subjected to analysis with the Phoenix M50 AST. Compared to the conventional disk diffusion AST, the category agreements for GP (excluding
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.