Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441441›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Treatment: The Experience of a High Volume Cancer Center.

Daniela Rega, Vincenza Granata, Carmela Romano, Valentina D'Angelo, Ugo Pace, Roberta Fusco, Carmela Cervone, Vincenzo Ravo, Fabiana Tatangelo, Antonio Avallone and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniela RegaColorectal Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Carmela RomanoExperimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1796-9873
Valentina D'AngeloGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Ugo PaceColorectal Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80100 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-9969
Carmela CervoneColorectal Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo RavoRadiation Therapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-7110
Fabiana TatangeloPathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Support to Cancer Pathways Diagnostics Area, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-6079
Antonio AvalloneExperimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6188-5664
Antonella PetrilloRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2465-5370
Paolo DelrioColorectal Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal treatments for rectal cancer, along with significant research on predictors to response to therapy, have led to more conservative surgical strategies. We describe our experience of the rectal sparing approach in rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant treatment. We also specifically highlight our clinical and imaging criteria to select patients for the watch and wait strategy (w&w). Data came from 39 out of 670 patients treated for locally advanced rectal cancer between January 2016 until February 2020. The selection criteria were a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy managed with a watch and wait (w&w) strategy. A strict follow-up period was adopted in these selected patients and follow-ups were performed every three months during the first two years and every six months after that. The median follow-up time was 28 months. Six patients had a local recurrence (15.3%); all were salvageable by total mesorectal excision (TME). Five patients had a distant metastasis (12.8%). There was no local unsalvageable disease after w&w strategy. The rectal sparing approach in patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant treatment is the best possible treatment and is appropriate to analyze from this perspective. The watch and wait approach after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer can be successfully explored after inflexible and strict patient selection.

Indexed as

MRIno operative managementrectal cancerrectal sparingwatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID34441441
PMCPMC8394713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.