Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441378›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Lung Ultrasound-Guided Fluid Management versus Standard Care in Surgical ICU Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Daniel-Mihai Rusu, Ioana Grigoraș, Mihaela Blaj, Ianis Siriopol, Adi-Ionut Ciumanghel, Gigel Sandu, Mihai Onofriescu, Olguta Lungu, Adrian Constantin Covic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interpretation of Lung Ultrasound in POCUS.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Lung Ultrasound: A Leading Diagnostic Tool.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel-Mihai RusuAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6669-3493
Ioana GrigorașAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9412-9574
Mihaela BlajAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Ianis SiriopolAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Adi-Ionut CiumanghelAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Sf. Spiridon University Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
Gigel SanduAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Sf. Spiridon University Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania.
Mihai OnofriescuNephrology Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Olguta LunguAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6873-7883
Adrian Constantin CovicNephrology Department, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of lung ultrasound (LU) in assessing extravascular lung water (EVLW) was demonstrated by comparing LU with gold-standard methods for EVLW assessment. However, few studies have analysed the value of B-Line score (BLS) in guiding fluid management during critical illness. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate if a BLS-guided fluid management strategy could improve fluid balance and short-term mortality in surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We conducted a randomised, controlled trial within the ICUs of two university hospitals. Critically ill patients were randomised upon ICU admission in a 1:1 ratio to BLS-guided fluid management (active group) or standard care (control group). In the active group, BLS was monitored daily until ICU discharge or day 28 (whichever came first). On the basis of BLS, different targets for daily fluid balance were set with the aim of avoiding or correcting moderate/severe EVLW increase. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Over 24 months, 166 ICU patients were enrolled in the trial and included in the final analysis. Trial results showed that daily BLS monitoring did not lead to a different cumulative fluid balance in surgical ICU patients as compared to standard care. Consecutively, no difference in 28-day mortality between groups was found (10.5% vs. 15.6%,

Indexed as

B-line scoreextravascular lung waterfluid managementintensive carelung ultrasoundrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34441378
PMCPMC8394150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.