Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441354›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Liquid-Based Screening Tests Results: HPV, Liquid-Based Cytology, and P16/Ki67 Dual-Staining in Private-Based Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening.

Martyna Trzeszcz, Maciej Mazurec, Robert Jach, Karolina Mazurec, Zofia Jach, Izabela Kotkowska-Szeps, Magdalena Kania, Mariola Wantuchowicz, Anna Prokopyk, Piotr Barcikowski and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Martyna TrzeszczCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9971-1093
Maciej MazurecCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2152-157X
Robert JachDivision of Gynecologic Endocrinology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kopernika 23, 31-501 Krakow, Poland.
Karolina MazurecCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Zofia JachSuperior Medical Center, Czyzynska 21/50, 31-571 Krakow, Poland.
Izabela Kotkowska-SzepsCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Magdalena KaniaCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Mariola WantuchowiczCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Anna ProkopykCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Piotr BarcikowskiCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Marcin PrzybylskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Public Hospital, Juraszow 7-19, 60-479 Poznan, Poland.
Joanna WachCorfamed Woman's Health Center, Kluczborska 37, 50-322 Wroclaw, Poland.
Agnieszka HalonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Division of Clinical Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The baseline data from the private-based opportunistic cervical cancer screening with HRHPV14, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and p16/Ki67 testing, and its quality assessment/quality control (QA/QC) tools are lacking. The age-stratified analysis of 30,066 screening tests results in a Polish population, including the investigation of HRHPV14 status, LBC, and p16/Ki67 dual-staining reporting rates, along with immediate histopathologic correlations, was conducted. For cytopathologic QA/QC, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) benchmarks and enhanced safety protocol were used. The NILM/ASC-US/LSIL/ASC-H/HSIL/AGC reporting rates were 93.9/3.4/2.0/0.22/0.24/0.11, respectively, with correlating HRHPV14-positive rates of 8.4/48.9/77.2/84.6/90.7/26.7. The reporting rates for HSIL (CIN2+) in HRHPV-positive women with NILM/ASC-US/LSIL/ASC-H/HSIL/AGC referred for a colposcopy with biopsy were 19.1/25.8/22.5/12.4/19.1/1.1% of the total HSIL (CIN2+). In total, of the 1130 p16/Ki67 tests, 30% were positive. In NILM HRHPV14-positive women with available histology result, HSIL(CIN2+) was detected in 28.3% of cases. In the first such large-scale Polish study presenting HRHPV14, informed LBC and HSIL (CIN2+) results, the reporting rates were highly consistent with data from American and other CAP-certified laboratories, confirming the possibility of using the 2019 ASCCP risk-based guidelines as one of the screening strategies outside of the US, in conditions of proper QA/QC. The private-based screening model can be effective in cervical cancer prevention, particularly in countries with low population coverage of public funds-based systems.

Indexed as

cervical cancer screeningcervical cytologyhigh-risk HPV testingp16/Ki67 dual-stainingprevention and control

Identifiers

PMID34441354
PMCPMC8394579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.