ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Deep Learning Application for Analyzing of Constituents and Their Correlations in the Interpretations of Medical Images.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-powered segmentation of bifid mandibular canals using CBCT.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of artifacts in cardiac MRI and their mitigation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Review
- Feature-based detection of breast cancer using convolutional neural network and feature engineering.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Predicting Unfavorable Pregnancy Outcomes in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Application of Deep Learning Algorithms Based on the Multilayer Y0L0v8 Neural Network to Identify Fungal Keratitis.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Article
- Smart Visualization of Medical Images as a Tool in the Function of Education in Neuroradiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022Review
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The need for time and attention, given by the doctor to the patient, due to the increased volume of medical data to be interpreted and filtered for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has encouraged the development of the option to support, constructively and effectively, deep learning models. Deep learning (DL) has experienced an exponential development in recent years, with a major impact on interpretations of the medical image. This has influenced the development, diversification and increase of the quality of scientific data, the development of knowledge construction methods and the improvement of DL models used in medical applications. All research papers focus on description, highlighting, classification of one of the constituent elements of deep learning models (DL), used in the interpretation of medical images and do not provide a unified picture of the importance and impact of each constituent in the performance of DL models. The novelty in our paper consists primarily in the unitary approach, of the constituent elements of DL models, namely, data, tools used by DL architectures or specifically constructed DL architecture combinations and highlighting their "key" features, for completion of tasks in current applications in the interpretation of medical images. The use of "key" characteristics specific to each constituent of DL models and the correct determination of their correlations, may be the subject of future research, with the aim of increasing the performance of DL models in the interpretation of medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.