Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441307›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Deep Learning Application for Analyzing of Constituents and Their Correlations in the Interpretations of Medical Images.

Tudor Florin Ursuleanu, Andreea Roxana Luca, Liliana Gheorghe, Roxana Grigorovici, Stefan Iancu, Maria Hlusneac, Cristina Preda, Alexandru Grigorovici

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comprehensive review of artifacts in cardiac MRI and their mitigation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Imaging in translational cancer research.Cancer biology & medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tudor Florin UrsuleanuFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-1787
Andreea Roxana LucaFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-4228
Liliana GheorgheFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Roxana GrigoroviciFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Stefan IancuFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Maria HlusneacFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Cristina PredaFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.
Alexandru GrigoroviciFaculty of General Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.

Funding

The University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T Popa " Iasi 4714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for time and attention, given by the doctor to the patient, due to the increased volume of medical data to be interpreted and filtered for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes has encouraged the development of the option to support, constructively and effectively, deep learning models. Deep learning (DL) has experienced an exponential development in recent years, with a major impact on interpretations of the medical image. This has influenced the development, diversification and increase of the quality of scientific data, the development of knowledge construction methods and the improvement of DL models used in medical applications. All research papers focus on description, highlighting, classification of one of the constituent elements of deep learning models (DL), used in the interpretation of medical images and do not provide a unified picture of the importance and impact of each constituent in the performance of DL models. The novelty in our paper consists primarily in the unitary approach, of the constituent elements of DL models, namely, data, tools used by DL architectures or specifically constructed DL architecture combinations and highlighting their "key" features, for completion of tasks in current applications in the interpretation of medical images. The use of "key" characteristics specific to each constituent of DL models and the correct determination of their correlations, may be the subject of future research, with the aim of increasing the performance of DL models in the interpretation of medical images.

Indexed as

applications in medicinedeep learning modelsmedical image analysismethods of incorporating knowledgetypes of data and datasets

Identifiers

PMID34441307
PMCPMC8393354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.