Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441297›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Precision Medicine for Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Right Drug for the Right Patient-Companion Diagnostics.

Richard Thomas Meehan, Isabelle Anne Amigues, Vijaya Knight

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PTEN: an emerging target in rheumatoid arthritis?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard Thomas MeehanDepartment of Medicine, Rheumatology Division, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4957-3091
Isabelle Anne AmiguesDepartment of Medicine, Rheumatology Division, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Vijaya KnightImmunology Department, Children's Hospital, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

Funding

ELi Lily and company Global Health Outcomes Projct agreement 05.24.2016 to establish a RA registry at National Jewish Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the growing number of biologic and JAK inhibitor therapeutic agents available to treat various systemic autoimmune illnesses, the lack of a validated companion diagnostic (CDx) to accurately predict drug responsiveness for an individual results in many patients being treated for years with expensive, ineffective, or toxic drugs. This review will focus primarily on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapeutics where the need is greatest due to poor patient outcomes if the optimum drug is delayed. We will review current FDA-approved biologic and small molecule drugs and why RA patients switch these medications. We will discuss the sampling of various tissues for potential CDx and review early results from studies investigating drug responsiveness utilizing advanced technologies including; multiplex testing of cytokines and proteins, autoantibody profiling, genomic analysis, proteomics, miRNA analysis, and metabolomics. By using these new technologies for CDx the goal is to improve RA patient outcomes and achieve similar successes like those seen in oncology using precision medicine guided therapeutics.

Indexed as

biologics for RAbiomarkers in RAcompanion diagnostic test (CDx)precision therapeutics for RARA drug responsiveness biomarker

Identifiers

PMID34441297
PMCPMC8391624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.