Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34441207›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Causality in Reversed Time Series: Reversed or Conserved?

Jakub Kořenek, Jaroslav Hlinka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jakub KořenekInstitute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodarenskou Vezi 271/2, 182 07 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2683-5300
Jaroslav HlinkaInstitute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodarenskou Vezi 271/2, 182 07 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-1470

Funding

České Vysoké Učení Technické v Praze SGS20/183/OHK4/3T/14Grantová Agentura České Republiky 19-11753SGrantová Agentura České Republiky 21-17211SGrantová Agentura České Republiky 21-32608SMinisterstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky 00023752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inference of causal relations between observable phenomena is paramount across scientific disciplines; however, the means for such enterprise without experimental manipulation are limited. A commonly applied principle is that of the cause preceding and predicting the effect, taking into account other circumstances. Intuitively, when the temporal order of events is reverted, one would expect the cause and effect to apparently switch roles. This was previously demonstrated in bivariate linear systems and used in design of improved causal inference scores, while such behaviour in linear systems has been put in contrast with nonlinear chaotic systems where the inferred causal direction appears unchanged under time reversal. The presented work explores the conditions under which the causal reversal happens-either perfectly, approximately, or not at all-using theoretical analysis, low-dimensional examples, and network simulations, focusing on the simplified yet illustrative linear vector autoregressive process of order one. We start with a theoretical analysis that demonstrates that a perfect coupling reversal under time reversal occurs only under very specific conditions, followed up by constructing low-dimensional examples where indeed the dominant causal direction is even conserved rather than reversed. Finally, simulations of random as well as realistically motivated network coupling patterns from brain and climate show that level of coupling reversal and conservation can be well predicted by asymmetry and anormality indices introduced based on the theoretical analysis of the problem. The consequences for causal inference are discussed.

Indexed as

brain networkcausalityclimate networkrandom networksreversed time seriestemporal symmetrytime reversalvector autoregressive process

Identifiers

PMID34441207
PMCPMC8391759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.