Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440859›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Electroconvulsive Shock, but Not Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Transiently Elevates Cell Proliferation in the Adult Mouse Hippocampus.

Tian Rui Zhang, Evelyn Guilherme, Aydan Kesici, Alyssa M Ash, Fidel Vila-Rodriguez, Jason S Snyder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tian Rui ZhangDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Evelyn GuilhermeDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Sao Carlos, Sao Carlo 13565-905, SP, Brazil.
Aydan KesiciDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Alyssa M AshDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Fidel Vila-RodriguezNon-Invasive Neurostimulation Therapies Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Jason S SnyderDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5509-0272
University of British Columbia · CAUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal plasticity is hypothesized to play a role in the etiopathogenesis of depression and the antidepressant effect of medications. One form of plasticity that is unique to the hippocampus and is involved in depression-related behaviors in animal models is adult neurogenesis. While chronic electroconvulsive shock (ECS) strongly promotes neurogenesis, less is known about its acute effects and little is known about the neurogenic effects of other forms of stimulation therapy, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Here, we investigated the time course of acute ECS and rTMS effects on markers of cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Mice were subjected to a single session of ECS, 10 Hz rTMS (10-rTMS), or intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). Mice in both TMS groups were injected with BrdU 2 days before stimulation to label immature cells. One, 3, or 7 days later, hippocampi were collected and immunostained for BrdU + cells, actively proliferating PCNA + cells, and immature DCX + neurons. Following ECS, mice displayed a transient increase in cell proliferation at 3 days post-stimulation. At 7 days post-stimulation there was an elevation in the number of proliferating neuronal precursor cells (PCNA + DCX +), specifically in the ventral hippocampus. iTBS and rTMS did not alter the number of BrdU + cells, proliferating cells, or immature neurons at any of the post-stimulation time points. Our results suggest that neurostimulation treatments exert different effects on hippocampal neurogenesis, where ECS may have greater neurogenic potential than iTBS and 10-rTMS.

Indexed as

ElectroshockAnimalsCell ProliferationDentate GyrusDoublecortin Domain ProteinsDoublecortin ProteinHippocampusMiceMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronal PlasticityNeuropeptidesProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenTranscranial Magnetic StimulationDcx protein, mouseDoublecortin Domain ProteinsDoublecortin ProteinMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNeuropeptidesProliferating Cell Nuclear Antigenadult neurogenesiscell proliferationelectroconvulsive shockplasticitytheta bursttranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34440859
PMCPMC8391684
OpenAlexW3195136713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.