Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440616›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Are We Ready for Migrastatics?

Jonathan Solomon, Magdalena Raškova, Daniel Rösel, Jan Brábek, Hava Gil-Henn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan SolomonCell Migration and Invasion Laboratory, The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 1311502, Israel.
Magdalena RaškovaLaboratory of Cancer Cell Invasion, Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel RöselLaboratory of Cancer Cell Invasion, Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-8672
Jan BrábekLaboratory of Cancer Cell Invasion, Department of Cell Biology, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7754-7299
Hava Gil-HennCell Migration and Invasion Laboratory, The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed 1311502, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-0478
Charles University · CZBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

Center for Tumor Ecology-Research of the Cancer Microenvironment Supporting Cancer Growth and Spread CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000785Israel Cancer Association 20210071Israel Cancer Research Fund 20-101-PG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis accounts for the highest mortality rates in solid tumor cancer patients. However, research and development have neglected this most lethal characteristic and, instead, have concentrated on the hallmarks of cancer that make tumor cells highly proliferative and distinctive from nonmalignant cells. The concentration on invasion and metastasis can be one of the most meaningful advancements in cancer investigation. Importantly, metastasis-free survival (MFS) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a novel primary endpoint in clinical trials and has been used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. This new definition enables to shift the focus of research and development in cancer therapeutics toward metastasis and to change the emphasis from using tumor shrinkage as a benchmark for indicating the efficacy of treatment to using MFS as a more representative endpoint for antimetastatic drugs. This perspective outlines the possibility to use this novel endpoint in other solid cancers, and examples of large clinical trials are given in which MFS is defined as an endpoint and/or in which antimetastatic strategies are being examined. These advances now open the door for the rapid development of antimetastatic therapies, which could be used in combination with standard cytotoxic cancer therapies. With pioneer research on metastasis prevention on the rise and the underlying biomechanisms of tumor cell motility and invasion explored further than ever before, we believe an intensified focus on antimetastatic properties will shape this era of cancer translational research.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell MovementClinical Trials as TopicEndpoint DeterminationHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsProgression-Free SurvivalResearch DesignTranslational Research, BiomedicalAntineoplastic Agentscancer metastasisclinical trialsmetastasis-free survivalmetastasis inhibitorresearch and development

Identifiers

PMID34440616
PMCPMC8392519
OpenAlexW3185254519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.