Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440500›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2021

A Comparison of the Capacity of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Cartilage Regeneration Depending on Collagen-Based Injectable Biomimetic Scaffold Type.

Victor I Sevastianov, Yulia B Basok, Ludmila A Kirsanova, Alexey M Grigoriev, Alexandra D Kirillova, Evgeniy A Nemets, Anastasia M Subbot, Sergey V Gautier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advanced injectable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor I SevastianovDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Yulia B BasokDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4807-3164
Ludmila A KirsanovaDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Alexey M GrigorievDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra D KirillovaDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2938-5883
Evgeniy A NemetsDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia M SubbotLaboratory of Fundamental Research in Ophtalmology, The Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 11A, B Rossolimo St., 119021 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8258-6011
Sergey V GautierDepartment for Biomedical Technologies and Tissue Engineering, The Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs, 1 Shchukinskaja St., 123182 Moscow, Russia.
V.I.Shumakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs · RUSechenov University · RU

Funding

the Russian Science Foundation 21-15-00251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have shown a high potential for cartilage repair. Collagen-based scaffolds are used to deliver and retain cells at the site of cartilage damage. The aim of the work was a comparative analysis of the capacity of the MSCs from human adipose tissue to differentiate into chondrocytes in vitro and to stimulate the regeneration of articular cartilage in an experimental model of rabbit knee osteoarthrosis when cultured on microheterogenic collagen-based hydrogel (MCH) and the microparticles of decellularized porcine articular cartilage (DPC). The morphology of samples was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy and histological staining methods. On the surface of the DPC, the cells were distributed more uniformly than on the MCH surface. On day 28, the cells cultured on the DPC produced glycosaminoglycans more intensely compared to the MCH with the synthesis of collagen type II. However, in the experimental model of osteoarthrosis, the stimulation of the cartilage regeneration was more effective when the MSCs were administered to the MCH carrier. The present study demonstrates the way to regulate the action of the MSCs in the area of cartilage regeneration: the MCH is more conducive to stimulating cartilage repair by the MSCs, while the DPC is an inducer for a formation of a cartilage-like tissue by the MSCs in vitro.

Indexed as

articular cartilagecollagendecellularizationhydrogelmesenchymal stromal cellsosteoarthrosis

Identifiers

PMID34440500
PMCPMC8400656
OpenAlexW3181434096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.