Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440390›Full record

ArticleGenes2021

Mitogenome Phylogeny Including Data from Additional Subspecies Provides New Insights into the Historical Biogeography of the Eurasian lynx

Deniz Mengüllüoğlu, Hüseyin Ambarlı, Axel Barlow, Johanna L A Paijmans, Ali Onur Sayar, Hasan Emir, İrfan Kandemir, Heribert Hofer, Jörns Fickel, Daniel W Förster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First mitogenome phylogeny of the sun bearEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  5. Phylogenetic History and Phylogeographic Patterns of the European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Complete mitochondrial genome ofBiodiversity data journal · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Deniz MengüllüoğluLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Hüseyin AmbarlıDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Management, Faculty of Forestry, Düzce University, Düzce 81620, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-9417
Axel BarlowSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5532-9458
Johanna L A PaijmansInstitute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1938-7052
Ali Onur SayarDepartment of Game and Wildlife, Cankiri Karatekin University, Cankiri 18100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6000-2946
Hasan EmirWildlife Department of General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks, Turkish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara 06000, Turkey.
İrfan KandemirDepartment of Biology, Ankara University, Ankara 06000, Turkey.
Heribert HoferLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2813-7442
Jörns FickelLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
Daniel W FörsterLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous molecular studies of the wide-ranging Eurasian lynx

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialPhylogeographyAnimalsAsiaDNA, MitochondrialEuropeEvolution, MolecularLynxDNA, MitochondrialAnatolian refugiumBalkan lynxbiogeographyCaucasian lynxHimalayan lynxintraspecific variationmitogenome

Identifiers

PMID34440390
PMCPMC8392285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.