Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440240›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Role of SpO2/FiO2 Ratio and ROX Index in Predicting Early Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in COVID-19. A Pragmatic, Retrospective, Multi-Center Study.

Ana Alberdi-Iglesias, Francisco Martín-Rodríguez, Guillermo Ortega Rabbione, Ana I Rubio-Babiano, María G Núñez-Toste, Ancor Sanz-García, Carlos Del Pozo Vegas, Miguel A Castro Villamor, José L Martín-Conty, Cristina Jorge-Soto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-invasive SpO2/FiO2 ratio (SFR) as surrogate for PaO2/FiO2 ratio (PFR): A scoping review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SpOBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The SpOJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ana Alberdi-IglesiasEmergency Department, Valladolid University Clinical Hospital, Castilla y León Regional Health Management (SACYL), 47005 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-3473
Francisco Martín-RodríguezAdvanced Clinical Simulation Centre, Advanced Life Support Unit, Emergency Medical Services, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1773-2860
Guillermo Ortega RabbioneData Analysis Unit, Health Research Institute, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid (IIS-IP), C/Diego de León, 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-6145
Ana I Rubio-BabianoEmergency Department, Valladolid University Clinical Hospital, Castilla y León Regional Health Management (SACYL), 47005 Valladolid, Spain.
María G Núñez-TosteEmergency Department, Valladolid University Clinical Hospital, Castilla y León Regional Health Management (SACYL), 47005 Valladolid, Spain.
Ancor Sanz-GarcíaData Analysis Unit, Health Research Institute, Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid (IIS-IP), C/Diego de León, 62, 28006 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5024-5108
Carlos Del Pozo VegasEmergency Department, Valladolid University Clinical Hospital, Castilla y León Regional Health Management (SACYL), 47005 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5561-1384
Miguel A Castro VillamorCentro de Simulación Clínica Avanzada, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9910-427X
José L Martín-ContyFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, 45600 Talavera de la Reina, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-2323
Cristina Jorge-SotoGrupo de Investigación CLINURSID, Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Raúl López-IzquierdoEmergency Department, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega de Valladolid, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), c/Dulzaina, 2, 47012 Valladolid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-4138

Funding

Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (Spain) GRS COVID 7/A/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of COVID-19 to compromise the respiratory system has generated a substantial proportion of critically ill patients in need of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The objective of this paper was to analyze the prognostic ability of the pulse oximetry saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (SpO2/FiO2) and the ratio of SpO2/FiO2 to the respiratory rate-ROX index-as predictors of IMV in an emergency department in confirmed COVID-19 patients. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was carried out in four provinces of Spain between March and November 2020. The discriminative power of the predictive variable was assessed through a prediction model trained using a derivation sub-cohort and evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) on the validation sub-cohort. A total of 2040 patients were included in the study. The IMV rate was 10.1%, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 35.3%. The performance of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio was better than the ROX index-AUC = 0.801 (95% CI 0.746-0.855) and AUC = 0.725 (95% CI 0.652-0.798), respectively. In fact, a direct comparison between AUCs resulted in significant differences (

Indexed as

clinical decision makingCOVID-19emergency carehypoxemiamechanical ventilationrisk scores

Identifiers

PMID34440240
PMCPMC8392288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.