Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440234›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Prenatal Diagnosis of Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosome 10 by Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization and Microdissected Chromosome Sequencing.

Igor N Lebedev, Tatyana V Karamysheva, Eugeny A Elisaphenko, Alexey I Makunin, Daria I Zhigalina, Maria E Lopatkina, Gleb V Drozdov, Aleksander D Cheremnykh, Natalia B Torkhova, Gulnara N Seitova and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cellular consequences of small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome 12: mosaicism in daughter and father.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Igor N LebedevTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0482-8046
Tatyana V KaramyshevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5140-4350
Eugeny A ElisaphenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey I MakuninWellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB101SA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9555-5097
Daria I ZhigalinaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Maria E LopatkinaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7051-3472
Gleb V DrozdovTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Aleksander D CheremnykhTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Natalia B TorkhovaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Gulnara N SeitovaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Stanislav A VasilyevTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-070X
Anna A KashevarovaTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Ludmila P NazarenkoTomsk National Research Medical Center, Research Institute of Medical Genetics, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Nikolay B RubtsovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-8057

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation 0259-2021-0011Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-015-00084аRussian Science Foundation 21-65-00017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interpreting the clinical significance of small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) in prenatal diagnosis is still an urgent problem in genetic counselling regarding the fate of a pregnancy. We present a case of prenatal diagnosis of mosaic sSMC(10) in a foetus with a normal phenotype. Comprehensive cytogenomic analyses by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), sSMC microdissection with next-generation sequencing (NGS) of microdissected library, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with locus-specific and telomere-specific DNA probes and quantitative real-time PCR revealed that sSMC(10) had a ring structure and was derived from the pericentromeric region of chromosome 10 with involvement of the 10p11.21-p11.1 and 10q11.21-q11.23 at 1.243 Mb and 7.173 Mb in size, respectively. We observed a difference in the length of sSMC(10) between NGS data of the DNA library derived from a single copy of sSMC(10), and aCGH results that may indicate instability and structural mosaicism for ring chromosomes in foetal cells. The presence of a 9 Mb euchromatin region in the analysed sSMC(10) did not lead to clinical manifestations, and a healthy girl was born at term. We suggest that the ring structure of sSMCs could influence sSMC manifestations and should be taken into account in genetic counselling during prenatal diagnosis.

Indexed as

array-based comparative genomic hybridizationchromosomal microdissectionmosaicismprenatal diagnosisring chromosomesingle-copy chromosome sequencingsmall supernumerary marker chromosome

Identifiers

PMID34440234
PMCPMC8391546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.