ReviewBiomedicines2021
Therapeutic Potential of PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancers.
Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with pamiparib versus placebo for advanced gastric cancer responding to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy: Phase 2 study results.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Gene, genetics and genetic medicines in gastroenterology: Current status and its future.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Review
- A comprehensive review of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal tumors with a focus on the role of combination therapy with PARP inhibitors.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Mechanisms and Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Proteasome and PARP1 dual-target inhibitor for multiple myeloma: Fluzoparib.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024Article
- PARP Inhibitors in Colorectal Malignancies: A 2023 Update.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024Review
- Deleterious and ethnic-related BRCA1/2 mutations in tissue and blood of Egyptian colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with human papillomavirus.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Talazoparib Dual-targeting on Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 and -16 Enzymes Offers a Promising Therapeutic Strategy in Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapy: Insight from Biophysical Computations.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2022Article
- Bromelain and acetylcysteine (BromAcAmerican journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are a major global health burden, with high mortality rates. The identification of novel therapeutic strategies is crucial to improve treatment and survival of patients. The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes involved in the DNA damage response (DDR) play major roles in the development, progression and treatment response of cancer, with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) currently used in the clinic for breast, ovarian, fallopian, primary peritoneal, pancreatic and prostate cancers with deficiencies in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. This article examines the current evidence for the role of the DDR PARP enzymes (PARP1, 2, 3 and 4) in the development, progression and treatment response of GI cancers. Furthermore, we discuss the role of HR status as a predictive biomarker of PARPi efficacy in GI cancer patients and examine the pre-clinical and clinical evidence for PARPi and cytotoxic therapy combination strategies in GI cancer. We also include an analysis of the genomic and transcriptomic landscape of the DDR PARP genes and key HR genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, RAD51, MRE11, PALB2) in GI patient tumours (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.