Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440219›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Treatment of Critical-Size Femoral Bone Defects with Chitosan Scaffolds Produced by a Novel Process from Textile Engineering.

Bruno Zwingenberger, Corina Vater, Roland L Bell, Julia Bolte, Elisabeth Mehnert, Ronny Brünler, Dilbar Aibibu, Stefan Zwingenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno ZwingenbergerUniversity Center of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Corina VaterUniversity Center of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-2800
Roland L BellDepartment of Trauma-, Reconstructive- and Hand-Surgery, Municipal Hospital of the City of Dresden, 01067 Dresden, Germany.
Julia BolteUniversity Center of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Elisabeth MehnertUniversity Center of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Ronny BrünlerInstitute of Textile Machinery and High Performance Material Technology (ITM), TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Dilbar AibibuInstitute of Textile Machinery and High Performance Material Technology (ITM), TU Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Stefan ZwingenbergerUniversity Center of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.

Funding

German Research Foundation DFG, SFB/TR 79
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate, in vitro and in vivo, the suitability of chitosan (CHS) scaffolds produced by the net-shape-nonwoven (NSN) technology, for use as bone graft substitutes in a critical-size femoral bone defect in rats. For in vitro investigations, scaffolds made of CHS, mineralized collagen (MCM), or human cancellous bone allograft (CBA) were seeded with human telomerase-immortalized mesenchymal stromal cells (hTERT-MSC), incubated for 14 days, and thereafter evaluated for proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. In vivo, CHS, MCM and CBA scaffolds were implanted into 5 mm critical-size femoral bone defects in rats. After 12 weeks, the volume of newly formed bone was determined by microcomputed tomography (µCT), while the degree of defect healing, as well as vascularization and the number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, was evaluated histologically. In vitro, CHS scaffolds showed significantly higher osteogenic properties, whereas treatment with CHS, in vivo, led to a lower grade of bone-healing compared to CBA and MCM. While chitosan offers a completely new field of scaffold production by fibers, these scaffolds will have to be improved in the future, regarding mechanical stability and osteoconductivity.

Indexed as

bone defectbone regenerationchitosantissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID34440219
PMCPMC8393398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.