Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34440192›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2021

Short-Term Bone Healing Response to Mechanical Stimulation-A Case Series Conducted on Sheep.

Jan Barcik, Manuela Ernst, Marc Balligand, Constantin Edmond Dlaska, Ludmil Drenchev, Stephan Zeiter, Devakara R Epari, Markus Windolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jan BarcikAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-5134
Manuela ErnstAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5352-6290
Marc BalligandDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Quartier Vallée 2, Avenue de Cureghem 7A-7D, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Constantin Edmond DlaskaOrthopaedic Research Institute of Queensland, 7 Turner Street, Townsville, QLD 4812, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3397-4798
Ludmil DrenchevBulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Metal Science 'Acad. A. Balevski', Shipchenski Prohod 67, 1574 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Stephan ZeiterAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
Devakara R EpariInstitute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, George Street 2, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9306-709X
Markus WindolfAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270 Davos, Switzerland.
AO Foundation · CHBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BGQueensland University of Technology · AUSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute · AUUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

AO Foundation AOTRAUMA Network AR2016_06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well known that mechanical stimulation promotes indirect fracture healing by triggering callus formation. We investigated the short-term response of healing tissue to mechanical stimulation to compare the changes in tissue stiffness during stimulation and resting phases in a preclinical case-series. Four sheep underwent a tibial osteotomy and were instrumented with a custom-made active fixator which applied a mechanical stimulation protocol of 1000 cycles/day, equally distributed over 12 h, followed by 12 h of rest. During each cycle, a surrogate metric for tissue stiffness was measured, enabling a continuous real-time monitoring of the healing progression. A daily stiffness increase during stimulation and an increase during resting were evaluated for each animal. One animal had to be excluded from the evaluation due to technical reasons. For all included animals, the stiffness began to increase within the second week post-op. A characteristic pattern was observed during daily measurements: the stiffness dropped considerably within the first stimulation cycles followed by a steady rise throughout the rest of the stimulation phase. However, for all included animals, the average daily stiffness increase within the first three weeks post operation was larger during resting than during stimulation (Sheep I: 16.9% vs. -5.7%; Sheep II: 14.7% vs. -1.8%; Sheep III: 8.9% vs. 1.6%). A continuous measurement of tissue stiffness together with a controlled fracture stimulation enabled the investigation of the short-term effects of specific stimulatory parameters, such as resting periods. Resting was identified as a potentially determining factor for bone healing progression. Optimizing the ratio between stimulation and resting may contribute to more robust fracture healing in the future.

Indexed as

active fixationbone mechanobiologyfracture healinginterfragmentary motionstissue stiffness

Identifiers

PMID34440192
PMCPMC8392136
OpenAlexW3187551096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.