Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439988›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Evaluation of Genomic Prediction for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance with a Multi-Parental Population.

Wentao Zhang, Kerry Boyle, Anita Brule-Babel, George Fedak, Peng Gao, Zeinab Robleh Djama, Brittany Polley, Richard Cuthbert, Harpinder Randhawa, Robert Graf and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Breeding for Plant Disease Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Mapping and validation of Fusarium wilt race 2 resistance QTL from Citrullus amarus line USVL246-FR2.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait genomic predictions on agronomic and disease resistance traits in spring wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wentao ZhangAquatic and Crop Resources Development, National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W9, Canada.
Kerry BoyleAquatic and Crop Resources Development, National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W9, Canada.
Anita Brule-BabelDepartment of Plant Science, Agriculture Building, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada.
George FedakOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.
Peng GaoAquatic and Crop Resources Development, National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W9, Canada.
Zeinab Robleh DjamaOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0C6, Canada.
Brittany PolleyAquatic and Crop Resources Development, National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W9, Canada.
Richard CuthbertSwift Current Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Swift Current, SK S9H 3X2, Canada.
Harpinder RandhawaLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.
Robert GrafLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.
Fengying JiangLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.
Francois EudesLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada.
Pierre R FobertAquatic and Crop Resources Development, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) resistance is quantitatively inherited, controlled by multiple minor effect genes, and highly affected by the interaction of genotype and environment. This makes genomic selection (GS) that uses genome-wide molecular marker data to predict the genetic breeding value as a promising approach to select superior lines with better resistance. However, various factors can affect accuracies of GS and better understanding how these factors affect GS accuracies could ensure the success of applying GS to improve FHB resistance in wheat. In this study, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of factors that affect GS accuracies with a multi-parental population designed for FHB resistance. We found larger sample sizes could get better accuracies. Training population designed by CDmean based optimization algorithms significantly increased accuracies than random sampling approach, while mean of predictor error variance (PEVmean) had the poorest performance. Different genomic selection models performed similarly for accuracies. Including prior known large effect quantitative trait loci (QTL) as fixed effect into the GS model considerably improved the predictability. Multi-traits models had almost no effects, while the multi-environment model outperformed the single environment model for prediction across different environments. By comparing within and across family prediction, better accuracies were obtained with the training population more closely related to the testing population. However, achieving good accuracies for GS prediction across populations is still a challenging issue for GS application.

Indexed as

Fusarium head blightgenomic selectionmodelprediction accuracy

Identifiers

PMID34439988
PMCPMC8389552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.