Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439956›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Stochastic Simulations as a Tool for Assessing Signal Fidelity in Gene Expression in Synthetic Promoter Design.

Elena Righetti, Cansu Uluşeker, Ozan Kahramanoğulları

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena RighettiDepartment of Mathematics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2092-4238
Cansu UluşekerDepartment of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway.
Ozan KahramanoğullarıDepartment of Mathematics, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5178-7470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design and development of synthetic biology applications in a workflow often involve connecting modular components. Whereas computer-aided design tools are picking up in synthetic biology as in other areas of engineering, the methods for verifying the correct functioning of living technologies are still in their infancy. Especially, fine-tuning for the right promoter strength to match the design specifications is often a lengthy and expensive experimental process. In particular, the relationship between signal fidelity and noise in synthetic promoter design can be a key parameter that can affect the healthy functioning of the engineered organism. To this end, based on our previous work on synthetic promoters for the

Indexed as

E. colimodellingnoisePhoBPhoRsimulationstochasticitysynthetic biologytwo-component systems

Identifiers

PMID34439956
PMCPMC8389217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.