Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439883›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2021

Isotopically Dimethyl Labeling-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Phosphoproteomes of Soybean Cultivars.

Atieh Moradi, Shuaijian Dai, Emily Oi Ying Wong, Guang Zhu, Fengchao Yu, Hon-Ming Lam, Zhiyong Wang, Al Burlingame, Chengtao Lin, Alireza Afsharifar and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phosphoproteomics: Advances in Research on Cadmium-Exposed Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Interaction of Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Atieh MoradiDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Shuaijian DaiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4747-9090
Emily Oi Ying WongDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Guang ZhuDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Fengchao YuDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Hon-Ming LamCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6673-8740
Zhiyong WangDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Al BurlingameDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Chengtao LinDepartment of Molecular, Cell & Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Alireza AfsharifarPlant Virology Research Centre, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71946-84471, Iran.
Weichuan YuDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Tingliang WangTsinghua-Peking Joint Centre for Life Sciences, Centre for Structural Biology, School of Life Sciences and School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Ning LiDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKShiraz University · IRCarnegie Institution for Science · USCenter for Life Sciences · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isotopically dimethyl labeling was applied in a quantitative post-translational modification (PTM) proteomic study of phosphoproteomic changes in the drought responses of two contrasting soybean cultivars. A total of 9457 phosphopeptides were identified subsequently, corresponding to 4571 phosphoprotein groups and 3889 leading phosphoproteins, which contained nine kinase families consisting of 279 kinases. These phosphoproteins contained a total of 8087 phosphosites, 6106 of which were newly identified and constituted 54% of the current soybean phosphosite repository. These phosphosites were converted into the highly conserved kinase docking sites by bioinformatics analysis, which predicted six kinase families that matched with those newly found nine kinase families. The overly post-translationally modified proteins (OPP) occupies 2.1% of these leading phosphoproteins. Most of these OPPs are photoreceptors, mRNA-, histone-, and phospholipid-binding proteins, as well as protein kinase/phosphatases. The subgroup population distribution of phosphoproteins over the number of phosphosites of phosphoproteins follows the exponential decay law, Y = 4.13e

Indexed as

DroughtsGlycine maxOsmotic PressurePhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationProteomeSoybean ProteinsPhosphoproteinsProteomeSoybean ProteinsGlycine maxisotopically dimethyl labelingoverly post-translationally modified protein (OPP)phosphoproteomicsquantitative PTM proteomicssoybean drought-tolerant cultivar

Identifiers

PMID34439883
PMCPMC8393417
OpenAlexW3196188552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.