Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439735›Full record

SynthesisBiomolecules2021

The Role of Glucose Transporters in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Heinrich Botha, Camile S Farah, Kendrick Koo, Nicola Cirillo, Michael McCullough, Rita Paolini, Antonio Celentano

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Prognostic significance of GLUT-1 in adenoid cystic carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Heme-glycolysis interplay in oral squamous cell carcinoma: insights into SLC48A1 and GLUT1 expression across histological grades.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. AssessingNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Biological biomarkers of oral cancer.Periodontology 2000 · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heinrich BothaMelbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Camile S FarahAustralian Centre for Oral Oncology Research & Education, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-6204
Kendrick KooMelbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Nicola CirilloMelbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Michael McCulloughMelbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Rita PaoliniMelbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
Antonio CelentanoMelbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-2511
The University of Melbourne · AUFiona Stanley Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a prevalent malignancy associated with a poor prognosis. The Warburg effect can be observed in OSCCs, with tumours requiring a robust glucose supply. Glucose transporters (GLUTs) and sodium-glucose co-transporters (SGLTs) are overexpressed in multiple malignancies, and are correlated with treatment resistance, clinical factors, and poor overall survival (OS). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the differences in GLUT/SGLT expression between OSCC and normal oral keratinocytes (NOK), as well as their role in the pathophysiology and prognosis of OSCC. A total of 85 studies were included after screening 781 papers. GLUT-1 is regularly expressed in OSCC and was found to be overexpressed in comparison to NOK, with high expression correlated to tumour stage, treatment resistance, and poor prognosis. No clear association was found between GLUT-1 and tumour grade, metastasis, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. GLUT-3 was less thoroughly studied but could be detected in most samples and is generally overexpressed compared to NOK. GLUT-3 negatively correlated with overall survival (OS), but there was insufficient data for correlations with other clinical factors. Expression of GLUT-2/GLUT-4/GLUT-8/GLUT-13/SGLT-1/SGLT-2 was only evaluated in a small number of studies with no significant differences detected. GLUTs 7 and 14 have never been evaluated in OSCC. In conclusion, the data demonstrates that GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 have a role in the pathophysiology of OSCC and represent valuable biomarkers to aid OSCC diagnosis and prognostication. Other GLUTs are comparatively understudied and should be further analysed because they may hold promise to improve patient care.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell LineGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeHumansMiceMouth NeoplasmsPrognosisSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckBiomarkers, TumorGlucose Transport Proteins, Facilitativeglucose transporterGLUToral canceroral squamous cell carcinomaprognosisSGLTtreatment resistance

Identifiers

PMID34439735
PMCPMC8392467
OpenAlexW3184720497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.