Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439673›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

The Bacterial Enzyme RfxCas13d Is Less Neurotoxic Than PspCas13b and Could Be a Promising RNA Editing and Interference Tool in the Nervous System.

Qin-Wei Wu, Josef P Kapfhammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Chemically Induced CRISPR/dCas13Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cas13d: A New Molecular Scissor for Transcriptome Engineering.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qin-Wei WuDepartment of Biomedicine, Institute of Anatomy, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7409-4025
Josef P KapfhammerDepartment of Biomedicine, Institute of Anatomy, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

China Scholarship Council no grant numberSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_189083Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_160038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA therapies using RNA editing and interference are currently being developed for neurological diseases. The CRISPR-Cas13 system, based on bacterial enzymes, holds great promise for developing efficient tools for RNA therapies. However, neurotoxic activity has been reported for Cas13a, and recent studies have reported toxic effects of PspCas13b and RfxCas13d during zebrafish and Drosophila embryonic development. It is important to investigate the safety of these bacterial enzymes in the context of the nervous system and neuronal development. In this study, we used mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells as a complex neuron type to test for the potential neurotoxic actions of RfxCas13d and PspCas13b. We found that PspCas13b significantly impeded the dendritic development of cultured Purkinje cells, similar to the neurotoxic action of Cas13a. In contrast, RfxCas13d did not exhibit a significant inhibition of dendritic development. A similar trend was found for axonal outgrowth. These results suggest varying neurotoxic properties for different Cas13 ortholog enzymes. We call for more studies to investigate, and possibly mitigate, the neurotoxicity of Cas13 proteins in order to improve the safety of the CRISPR-Cas13 system for RNA therapies.

Indexed as

CRISPRneurotoxicPspCas13bPurkinje cellsRfxCas13d

Identifiers

PMID34439673
PMCPMC8394060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.