Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439611›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

"Stay at Home" in Italy during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Longitudinal Study on Individual Well-Being among Different Age Groups.

Alessandro Quaglieri, Giulia Lausi, Angelo Fraschetti, Jessica Burrai, Benedetta Barchielli, Alessandra Pizzo, Pierluigi Cordellieri, Luigi De Gennaro, Maurizio Gorgoni, Fabio Ferlazzo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Resilience, Positivity and Social Support as Perceived Stress Predictors among University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Fear of COVID-19: Gender Differences among Italian Health Volunteers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alessandro QuaglieriDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2341-1876
Giulia LausiDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-2230
Angelo FraschettiDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-5789
Jessica BurraiDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3223-4421
Benedetta BarchielliDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8703-8578
Alessandra PizzoDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7330-0918
Pierluigi CordellieriDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Luigi De GennaroDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3613-6631
Maurizio GorgoniDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-5483
Fabio FerlazzoDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Stefano SdoiaDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9275-8350
Pierpaolo ZiviDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6063-1678
Anna Maria GianniniDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0614-4457
Emanuela MariDepartment of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-3139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The restrictions imposed by the Italian government because of the coronavirus outbreak have been shown to be demanding on the Italian population. Data were collected at four different time points from 29 March 2020 to 3 May 2020 and during the final follow-up survey on 12 October 2020. In the present study, we provided longitudinal evidence on the relationship between the lockdown and mental health dimensions, such as emotional state, perceived stress, and time perspective, for three age groups. The results allowed us to observe their psychological status from different perspectives at five different time points. Notably, a negative effect of the lockdown individual well-beings emerged as a trend, and differences in individual adaptation strategies to a prolonged stressful situation were observed at the follow-up. Indeed, pairwise comparisons between age groups showed that the young adult group (18-23 years old) seemed to be the most psychologically affected by the lockdown. The findings are discussed according to the most recent literature on the topic. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first longitudinal studies carried out in Italy concerning the general psychological effects of the coronavirus lockdown.

Indexed as

coronavirusemotional stateperceived stresssocial distanceyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34439611
PMCPMC8394798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.