Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439587›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Comparison of Brain Activation Patterns during Olfactory Stimuli between Recovered COVID-19 Patients and Healthy Controls: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Study.

Roger C Ho, Vijay K Sharma, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Alison Y Y Ng, Yit-Shiang Lui, Syeda Fabeha Husain, Cyrus S Ho, Bach X Tran, Quang-Hai Pham, Roger S McIntyre and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Psychiatric and neurological complications of long COVID.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Roger C HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-9629-4493
Vijay K SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8976-5696
Benjamin Y Q TanDepartment of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1824-9077
Alison Y Y NgDepartment of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-8593
Yit-Shiang LuiDepartment of Psychological Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore 119228, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2921-3942
Syeda Fabeha HusainDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
Cyrus S HoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore.
Bach X TranBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Quang-Hai PhamInstitute for Global Health Innovations, Duy Tan University, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam.
Roger S McIntyreMood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4733-2523
Amanda C Y ChanDepartment of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, Singapore.

Funding

iHeathtech, National University of Singapore Other Operating Expenses (R-722-000-004-731)Vingroup Innovation Foundation Project code VINIF.2019.DA14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired sense of smell occurs in a fraction of patients with COVID-19 infection, but its effect on cerebral activity is unknown. Thus, this case report investigated the effect of COVID-19 infection on frontotemporal cortex activity during olfactory stimuli. In this preliminary study, patients who recovered from COVID-19 infection (

Indexed as

COVID-19functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)olfactory stimulisniffin’ sticks 12-identification test

Identifiers

PMID34439587
PMCPMC8391911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.