Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439218›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

3D Printing and Bioprinting to Model Bone Cancer: The Role of Materials and Nanoscale Cues in Directing Cell Behavior.

Tiziana Fischetti, Gemma Di Pompo, Nicola Baldini, Sofia Avnet, Gabriela Graziani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Making In Vitro Tumor Models Whole Again.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A bone-based 3D scaffold as anFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiziana FischettiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Gemma Di PompoBiomedical Science and Technologies Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5121-4330
Nicola BaldiniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Sofia AvnetDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Gabriela GrazianiLaboratory of NanoBiotechnology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2837-5977
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

Eranet-lac PER-2012-ELAC2015/T07-0713Italian Association for Cancer Research AIRC IG n. 21403Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance 5xMille for Scientific ResearchMinistry of Health project Start-ing Grant SG-2018-12367059, BANDO RICERCA FINALIZZATA 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone cancer, both primary and metastatic, is characterized by a low survival rate. Currently, available models lack in mimicking the complexity of bone, of cancer, and of their microenvironment, leading to poor predictivity. Three-dimensional technologies can help address this need, by developing predictive models that can recapitulate the conditions for cancer development and progression. Among the existing tools to obtain suitable 3D models of bone cancer, 3D printing and bioprinting appear very promising, as they enable combining cells, biomolecules, and biomaterials into organized and complex structures that can reproduce the main characteristic of bone. The challenge is to recapitulate a bone-like microenvironment for analysis of stromal-cancer cell interactions and biological mechanics leading to tumor progression. In this review, existing approaches to obtain in vitro 3D-printed and -bioprinted bone models are discussed, with a focus on the role of biomaterials selection in determining the behavior of the models and its degree of customization. To obtain a reliable 3D bone model, the evaluation of different polymeric matrices and the inclusion of ceramic fillers is of paramount importance, as they help reproduce the behavior of both normal and cancer cells in the bone microenvironment. Open challenges and future perspectives are discussed to solve existing shortcomings and to pave the way for potential development strategies.

Indexed as

3D bioprinting3D printingbone cancerbone modelcalcium phosphatesorthopedics

Identifiers

PMID34439218
PMCPMC8391202
OpenAlexW3188880271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.