Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34439082›Full record

ReviewCancers2021

The Liquid Biopsy for Lung Cancer: State of the Art, Limitations and Future Developments.

Daniel Di Capua, Dara Bracken-Clarke, Karine Ronan, Anne-Marie Baird, Stephen Finn

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06105177 (Implementation of Up-front ctDNA Analysis Into Lung Cancer Care and Development of Liquid Biopsy-based Decision Support Models - the Lungmarker² Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06105177 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of Up-front ctDNA Analysis Into Lung Cancer Care and Development of Liquid Biopsy-based Decision Support Models - the Lungmarker² Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCatharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenRan2023 to 2026Enrolled800ConditionsLung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Biomarker-Driven Treatments for Ovarian Cancer: Moving Beyond HRD?International journal of women's health · 2026
    Review
  15. Predicting response to patients with gastric cancer via a dynamic-aware model with longitudinal liquid biopsy data.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  16. Liquid biopsy in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Effect ofPakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel Di CapuaDepartment of Histopathology, St. James's Hospital, D08NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9855-6204
Dara Bracken-ClarkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. James' Hospital, D08NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.
Karine RonanFaculty of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Anne-Marie BairdSchool of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College, D02PN40 Dublin, Ireland.
Stephen FinnDepartment of Histopathology, St. James's Hospital, D08NHY1 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8628-5814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, contributing to 18.4% of cancer deaths globally. Treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma has seen rapid progression with targeted therapies tailored to specific genetic drivers. However, identifying genetic alterations can be difficult due to lack of tissue, inaccessible tumors and the risk of complications for the patient with serial tissue sampling. The liquid biopsy provides a minimally invasive method which can obtain circulating biomarkers shed from the tumor and could be a safer alternative to tissue biopsy. While tissue biopsy remains the gold standard, liquid biopsies could be very beneficial where serial sampling is required, such as monitoring disease progression or development of resistance mutations to current targeted therapies. Liquid biopsies also have a potential role in identifying patients at risk of relapse post treatment and as a component of future lung cancer screening protocols. Rapid developments have led to multiple platforms for isolating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); however, standardization is lacking, especially in lung carcinoma. Additionally, clonal hematopoiesis of uncertain clinical significance must be taken into consideration in genetic sequencing, as it introduces the potential for false positives. Various biomarkers have been investigated in liquid biopsies; however, in this review, we will concentrate on the current use of ctDNA and CTCs, focusing on the clinical relevance, current and possible future applications and limitations of each.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellscirculating tumor DNAliquid biopsylung cancernon-small cell lung carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34439082
PMCPMC8391249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.