Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438810›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Chickpea Can Be a Valuable Local Produced Protein Feed for Organically Reared, Native Bulls.

Francesco Serrapica, Felicia Masucci, Giuseppe De Rosa, Serena Calabrò, Claudia Lambiase, Antonio Di Francia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Potential Use of Kasedbok (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. The Effect of Indigo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco SerrapicaDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7838-2465
Felicia MasucciDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2382-0354
Giuseppe De RosaDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Serena CalabròDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Produzioni Animali, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Delpino 1, 80137 Napoli, Italy.
Claudia LambiaseDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
Antonio Di FranciaDipartimento di Agraria, Università di Napoli Federico II, Via Università 100, 80055 Portici, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed the effects of inclusion of chickpea from 24 to 21%, as feed basis, in diets for organically reared bulls. Sixteen young bulls (270 ± 6.4 days of age; 246 ± 0.13 kg in weight) belonging to a native Italian breed (Maremmana) were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments. The control diets were based on mixed grass hay, maize meal, and barley meal. In the experimental diets, barley was equally substituted by locally produced chickpea. Animals were weighed every 2 weeks until the prefixed slaughtering weight (630 kg). Plasma metabolites were measured at the 1st, 7th, and 14th month of the experiment. Chemical composition, colour, shear force, and water holding capacity of meat were assessed on

Indexed as

growing bullsmetabolic profilenative breedsorganic meat productionpulse seeds

Identifiers

PMID34438810
PMCPMC8388641
OpenAlexW3193162436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.