Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438695›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Research on Evaluating the Filtering Method for Broiler Sound Signal from Multiple Perspectives.

Zhigang Sun, Mengmeng Gao, Guotao Wang, Bingze Lv, Cailing He, Yuru Teng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhigang SunElectronic Engineering College, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-9627
Mengmeng GaoElectronic Engineering College, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.
Guotao WangElectronic Engineering College, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.
Bingze LvElectronic Engineering College, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.
Cailing HeElectronic Engineering College, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.
Yuru TengElectronic Engineering College, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China.

Funding

Department of Education, Heilongjiang Province 2020-KYYWF-1006Department of Education, Heilongjiang Province HDRCCX-201604Heilongjiang University 2012TD007Heilongjiang University HDJMRH201912Heilongjiang University QL2015National Natural Science Foundation of China 51607059Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province JJ2020LH1310Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province QC2017059Postdoctoral Scientific Research Development Fund of Heilongjiang Province LBH-Z16169Science and Technology Department, Heilongjiang Province TSTAU-C2018016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broiler sounds can provide feedback on their own body condition, to a certain extent. Aiming at the noise in the sound signals collected in broiler farms, research on evaluating the filtering methods for broiler sound signals from multiple perspectives is proposed, and the best performer can be obtained for broiler sound signal filtering. Multiple perspectives include the signal angle and the recognition angle, which are embodied in three indicators: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), root mean square error (RMSE), and prediction accuracy. The signal filtering methods used in this study include Basic Spectral Subtraction, Improved Spectral Subtraction based on multi-taper spectrum estimation, Wiener filtering and Sparse Decomposition using both thirty atoms and fifty atoms. In analysis of the signal angle, Improved Spectral Subtraction based on multi-taper spectrum estimation achieved the highest average SNR of 5.5145 and achieved the smallest average RMSE of 0.0508. In analysis of the recognition angle, the kNN classifier and Random Forest classifier achieved the highest average prediction accuracy on the data set established from the sound signals filtered by Wiener filtering, which were 88.83% and 88.69%, respectively. These are significantly higher than those obtained by classifiers on data sets established from sound signals filtered by other methods. Further research shows that after removing the starting noise in the sound signal, Wiener filtering achieved the highest average SNR of 5.6108 and a new RMSE of 0.0551. Finally, in comprehensive analysis of both the signal angle and the recognition angle, this research determined that Wiener filtering is the best broiler sound signal filtering method. This research lays the foundation for follow-up research on extracting classification features from high-quality broiler sound signals to realize broiler health monitoring. At the same time, the research results can be popularized and applied to studies on the detection and processing of livestock and poultry sound signals, which has extremely important reference and practical value.

Indexed as

broiler sound signalmultiple perspectivesprediction accuracyroot mean square errorsignal filtering methodsignal-to-noise ratio

Identifiers

PMID34438695
PMCPMC8388365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.