Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438624›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

The Dog-Owner Relationship: Refinement and Validation of the Italian C/DORS for Dog Owners and Correlation with the LAPS.

Giacomo Riggio, Patrizia Piotti, Silvana Diverio, Carmen Borrelli, Francesco Di Iacovo, Angelo Gazzano, Tiffani Josey Howell, Federica Pirrone, Chiara Mariti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Flat-Faced or Non-Flat-Faced Cats? That Is the Question.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giacomo RiggioDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Patrizia PiottiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-8712
Silvana DiverioLaboratory of Ethology and Animal Welfare (LEBA), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2128-6952
Carmen BorrelliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Francesco Di IacovoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Angelo GazzanoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9649-2027
Tiffani Josey HowellAnthrozoology Research Group, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC 3552, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-5792
Federica PirroneDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8641-3858
Chiara MaritiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-4680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Cat/Dog-Owner Relationship Scale (C/DORS) can be administered to both dog and cat owners. However, the scale as a whole has never been validated on a sample of dog owners. Furthermore, it has never been translated into Italian. The aim of this study was to translate the C/DORS into Italian, modify its response scale in order to improve the degree of response variability, and test its validity and reliability on a sample of dog-owners. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the same three-factor structure (Perceived Emotional Closeness = PEC, Pet-Owner Interactions = POI, Perceived Costs = PC) as the original English version, although some items had to be removed because of low- or cross-loadings. The validity of the construct was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis, by the correlations between each of the subscales and the C/DORS total score, and by the correlations with the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale. Cronbach's α values for each subscale were above acceptable levels. Student owners scored higher on PEC and POI than owners with other occupations. Owners of dogs with behavioural problems scored lower on PEC and higher on PC. Keeping the dog outdoor was associated with lower POI. Finally, pet dog owners scored higher on PEC than AAI dog owners.

Indexed as

bondC/DORSdogItalianLAPSMDORSownerpetrelationshipvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34438624
PMCPMC8388506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.