Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438317›Full record

ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2021

Numerical simulations for sonochemistry.

Kyuichi Yasui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Thin Layer Sonoelectrochemistry: The Solvents.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Physicochemical reactions in e-waste recycling.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Mechanochemical Degradation of Biopolymers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Why Sonochemistry in a Thin Layer? Constructive Interference.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. On Some Aspects of Nanobubble-Containing Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Special issue on "sonochemistry in asia 2021″.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kyuichi YasuiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2266-98 Anagahora, Shimoshidami, Moriyama-ku, Nagoya 463-8560, Japan. Electronic address: k.yasui@aist.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerical simulations for sonochemistry are reviewed including single-bubble sonochemistry, influence of ultrasonic frequency and bubble size, acoustic field, and sonochemical synthesis of nanoparticles. The theoretical model of bubble dynamics including the effect of non-equilibrium chemical reactions inside a bubble has been validated from the study of single-bubble sonochemistry. By the numerical simulations, it has been clarified that there is an optimum bubble temperature for the production of oxidants inside an air bubble such as OH radicals and H

Indexed as

Bubble dynamics modelNumerical simulationOH radicalOptimum bubble temperatureSingle-bubble sonochemistrySonochemical synthesis of nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID34438317
PMCPMC8387904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.