Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438292›Full record

ArticleGait & posture2021

Normative database of postural sway measures using inertial sensors in typically developing children and young adults.

Stephanie Voss, Cris Zampieri, Alexandras Biskis, Nicholas Armijo, Nicollette Purcell, Bichun Ouyang, Yuanqing Liu, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Joan A O'Keefe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gait & posture, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lifespan changes in postural control.Scientific reports · 2023
    Article
  8. Mechanography in children: pediatric references in postural control.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie VossDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Cris ZampieriRehabilitation Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Alexandras BiskisDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Nicholas ArmijoDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Nicollette PurcellDepartment of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Bichun OuyangDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Yuanqing LiuDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Elizabeth Berry-KravisDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Joan A O'KeefeDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Cell & Molecular Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States. Electronic address: joan_a_okeefe@rush.edu.
Rush University · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · US

Funding

Impact of Cognitive function on Balance and Gait Markers for FXTASK01HD088762 · NICHD · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI O'KEEFE, JOAN A · 2016 to 2021
$711k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD088762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReference values utilizing the APDM MobilityLab® inertial sensor system have not been established in children and young adults ages 5-30. These values are necessary for clinicians and researchers to compare to children with balance impairments.

methodsA group of 144 typically developing children and young adults from age 5-30 years completed the instrumented SWAY test during 6 test conditions: normal stance, firm surface, eyes open (EO) and closed (EC); normal stance, foam surface, EO and EC; and tandem stance, firm surface, EO and EC. Selected variables for normative outcomes included total sway area, and the mean, sagittal and coronal values for RMS sway, jerk, sway velocity and path length. Sex differences were examined within age groups via t tests. The effect of age on postural sway variables was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA for the mean values of total sway area, RMS sway, velocity and jerk, followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons.

resultsAll sway parameters decreased significantly with age (p < 0.0001). Adult-like total sway area and jerk were achieved by ages 9-10 except for jerk during EC on foam. RMS sway and sway velocity reached adult levels by ages 11-13 during all EO and tandem stance conditions, and 14-21 with EC during normal stance on firm and foam surfaces for RMS sway and EC on firm surfaces for velocity. Females ages 5-6 performed more poorly during EO firm and EC foam for certain variables, but better during EO tandem and females ages 7-13 outperformed males when sex differences were found. SIGNIFICANCE: These reference values can now be used by clinicians and researchers to evaluate abnormal postural sway and response to interventions in children and young adults.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleReference ValuesYoung AdultAPDM MobilityLab®BalanceChildrenInertial sensorsNormative

Identifiers

PMID34438292
PMCPMC9482794
OpenAlexW3186161147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.