Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438255›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage2021

Networks underpinning emotion: A systematic review and synthesis of functional and effective connectivity.

Raphael Underwood, Eva Tolmeijer, Johannes Wibroe, Emmanuelle Peters, Liam Mason

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changes in Intrinsic Activity of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex Causally Explain Differences in Emotion Perception in Autism.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  6. Brain iron distribution in transdiagnostic mental health burden.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raphael UnderwoodPsychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, United Kingdom. Electronic address: raphael.underwood@slam.nhs.uk.
Eva TolmeijerPsychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, United Kingdom.
Johannes WibroePsychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, United Kingdom.
Emmanuelle PetersPsychology & Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, United Kingdom.
Liam MasonMax Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London United Kingdom; Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S006613/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing models of emotion processing are based almost exclusively on brain activation data, yet make assumptions about network connectivity. There is a need to integrate connectivity findings into these models. We systematically reviewed all studies of functional and effective connectivity employing tasks to investigate negative emotion processing and regulation in healthy participants. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria. A quality assessment tool was derived from prominent neuroimaging papers. The evidence supports existing models, with primarily limbic regions for salience and identification, and frontal areas important for emotion regulation. There was mixed support for the assumption that regulatory influences on limbic and sensory areas come predominantly from prefrontal areas. Rather, studies quantifying effective connectivity reveal context-dependent dynamic modulatory relationships between occipital, subcortical, and frontal regions, arguing against purely top-down regulatory theoretical models. Our quality assessment tool found considerable variability in study design and tasks employed. The findings support and extend those of previous syntheses focused on activation studies, and provide evidence for a more nuanced view of connectivity in networks of human emotion processing and regulation.

Indexed as

AmygdalaBrain MappingEmotional RegulationEmotionsFemaleFrontal LobeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysPrefrontal CortexCausal connectivityDynamic causal modelingEffective connectivityEmotionFunctional connectivityHealthyHuman

Identifiers

PMID34438255
PMCPMC8905299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.