Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34438133›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care2021

Single versus multiple doses of Tocilizumab in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A two-center, retrospective cohort study.

Khalid Al Sulaiman, Ohoud Aljuhani, Khalid Bin Salah, Ghazwa B Korayem, Khalid Eljaaly, Mohammed Al Essa, Abdullah Kharbosh, Feras Al Harbi, Maram Abuzaid, Sarah Al Bilal and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in older adult critically ill patients with COVID-19: a multicenter, cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Khalid Al SulaimanPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: alsulaimankh@hotmail.com.
Ohoud AljuhaniDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid Bin SalahPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Pharmacy, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghazwa B KorayemDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid EljaalyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Mohammed Al EssaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah KharboshDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Feras Al HarbiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maram AbuzaidDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Prince Mohamed bin Abdulaziz Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah Al BilalPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alaa AlmagthaliPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Samia AlsohemiPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Adel AlshabasyDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive care, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Haytham NoureldeenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive care, Ain Shams University, Egypt.
Mohammed AboudeifDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Asma AlshehriPharmaceutical Care Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ramesh VishwakarmaKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SAAin Shams University · EGKing Abdulaziz Hospital · SAKing Saud University · SAPrince Mohammed bin Abdulaziz Hospital · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SATaif University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the optimal tocilizumab dosing regimen.

methodsA two-center, retrospective cohort study, for COVID19 critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care units (ICUs). We included critically ill patients aged 18 years or older who received tocilizumab during ICU stay. Patients were divided into two groups based on the number of the received tocilizumab doses. The primary outcome was the in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Propensity score (PS) matching was used (1:1 ratio) based on the selected criteria.

resultsA total of 298 patients were included in the study; 70.4% (210 patients) received a single dose of tocilizumab. After adjusting for possible confounders, the 30-day mortality (HR 0.79 95% CI 0.43-1.45 P = 0.44) and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.46-1.49; P = 0.53) were not significantly different between the two groups. On the flip side, patients who received multiple doses had higher pneumonia odds than a single dose (OR 3.81; 95% CI 1.79-8.12 P = 0.0005).

conclusionRepeating tocilizumab doses were not associated with a mortality benefit in COVID-19 critically ill patients, but it was associated with higher odds of pneumonia compared to a single dose.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedtocilizumabCOVID-19Critically illIntensive Care Units (ICUs)Multiple-doseSARS-Cov-2Single-doseTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34438133
PMCPMC8381723
OpenAlexW3160241555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.