Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437927›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infection2021

Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 COVID vaccine after 6 months surveillance in health care workers; a third dose is necessary.

Marie Tré-Hardy, Roberto Cupaiolo, Alain Wilmet, Thomas Antoine-Moussiaux, Andrea Della Vecchia, Alexandra Horeanga, Emmanuelle Papleux, Marc Vekemans, Ingrid Beukinga, Laurent Blairon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie Tré-HardyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, rue Jean Paquot 63, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Pharmacy, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, Belgium. Electronic address: mtrehardy@his-izz.be.
Roberto CupaioloDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, rue Jean Paquot 63, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Alain WilmetDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, rue Jean Paquot 63, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Thomas Antoine-MoussiauxDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Andrea Della VecchiaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Alexandra HoreangaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Emmanuelle PapleuxDepartment of Pneumology, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc VekemansDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Iris Hospitals South, Brussels, Belgium.
Ingrid BeukingaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, rue Jean Paquot 63, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Laurent BlaironDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Iris Hospitals South, rue Jean Paquot 63, 1050 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesScarce data are currently available on the kinetics of antibodies after vaccination with mRNA vaccines as a whole and, with mRNA-1273, in particular. We report here an ad-interim analysis of data obtained after a 6-month follow-up in a cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) who received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. These new data provide more insight into whether and in whom a 3rd dose could be necessary.

methodsOur study compared the anti-S antibody kinetics at 2 weeks (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months (T4) after the first injection, and 2 weeks after the second injection (T2). The 201 participating HCWs were stratified according to their initial serological status. The vaccine effectiveness was also assessed through a medical questionnaire.

resultsWe report here a marked and statistically significant antibody decrease (P < 0.05) between T3 and T4, especially in naïve vaccinees. The analysis of potential confounding factors or known risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease did not reveal any influence on the drop observed. Six-month after vaccination, only one, symptomatic, infection was reported in our cohort.

conclusionsIn a supply-limited environment, our results plead for reserving the 3rd dose scheme, in the upcoming months, to seronegative individuals prior to vaccination, especially when the serological status is easily accessible.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Vaccines2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralHealth PersonnelHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesRNA, MessengerCOVID-19EfficacyImmunogenicitymRNA-1273 vaccineSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34437927
PMCPMC8380546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.