Trial reportMolecular oncology2022
Multi-omic molecular profiling guide's efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial.
Trial report in Molecular oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Molecular Classification in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Toward Subtype-Guided Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Pan-cancer multi-omic ERBB2-HER2 characterization using next-generation sequencing and quantitative proteomics.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- The Growth Modulation Index (GMI) as an Efficacy Outcome in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review with Suggested Reporting Guidelines.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- Real-time functional proteomics enhances therapeutic targeting in precision oncology molecular tumor boards.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Post-Translational Modification Analyses by Reverse Phase Protein Array.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Functional activation of the AKT-mTOR signalling axis in a real-world metastatic breast cancer cohort.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Quantitative proteomic analysis of HER2 protein expression in PDAC tumors.Clinical proteomics · 2024Article
- Targeting HER2/HER3 co-mutations in metastatic breast cancer: Case reports of exceptional responders to trastuzumab and pertuzumab therapy.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Moving toward precision medicine to predict drug sensitivity in patients with metastatic breast cancer.ESMO open · 2024Review
- The Breast Cancer Proteome and Precision Oncology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023Review
- The first-in-class ERK inhibitor ulixertinib shows promising activity in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-driven pediatric low-grade glioma models.Neuro-oncology · 2023Article
- AKT/mTOR signaling modulates resistance to endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibition in metastatic breast cancers.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
- Analysis of neuroendocrine clones in NSCLCs using an immuno-guided laser-capture microdissection-based approach.Cell reports methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi-omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP-selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow-up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11-22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan-based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan-based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.