Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437759›Full record

Trial reportMolecular oncology2022

Multi-omic molecular profiling guide's efficacious treatment selection in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a prospective phase II clinical trial.

Mariaelena Pierobon, Nicholas J Robert, Donald W Northfelt, Mohammad Jahanzeb, Shukmei Wong, Kimberly A Hodge, Elisa Baldelli, Jessica Aldrich, David W Craig, Lance A Liotta and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Breast Cancer Proteome and Precision Oncology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Mariaelena PierobonGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2084-1029
Nicholas J RobertUS Oncology Network/Virginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Donald W NorthfeltMayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Mohammad JahanzebA Division of 21st Century Oncology, Florida Precision Oncology, Raton, FL, USA.
Shukmei WongTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Kimberly A HodgeGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Elisa BaldelliGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Jessica AldrichTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
David W CraigTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Lance A LiottaGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Sanja AvramovicDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Janusz WojtusiakDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Farrokh AlemiDepartment of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Julia D WulfkuhleGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Angela BellosGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Rosa I GallagherGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
David ArguelloCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Amber ConradCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ariane KemkesParadigm Diagnostics, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
David M LoeschParadigm Diagnostics, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Linda VocilaTranslational Drug Development (TD2), Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Bryant DunetzThe Side-Out Foundation, Fairfax, VA, USA.
John D CarptenTranslational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Emanuel F PetricoinGeorge Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.
Stephen P AnthonyEvergreen Hematology-Oncology, Spokane, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective phase II clinical trial (Side Out 2) explored the clinical benefits of treatment selection informed by multi-omic molecular profiling (MoMP) in refractory metastatic breast cancers (MBCs). Core needle biopsies were collected from 32 patients with MBC at trial enrollment. Patients had received an average of 3.94 previous lines of treatment in the metastatic setting before enrollment in this study. Samples underwent MoMP, including exome sequencing, RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), immunohistochemistry, and quantitative protein pathway activation mapping by Reverse Phase Protein Microarray (RPPA). Clinical benefit was assessed using the previously published growth modulation index (GMI) under the hypothesis that MoMP-selected therapy would warrant further investigation for GMI ≥ 1.3 in ≥ 35% of the patients. Of the 32 patients enrolled, 29 received treatment based on their MoMP and 25 met the follow-up criteria established by the trial protocol. Molecular information was delivered to the tumor board in a median time frame of 14 days (11-22 days), and targetable alterations for commercially available agents were found in 23/25 patients (92%). Of the 25 patients, 14 (56%) reached GMI ≥ 1.3. A high level of DNA topoisomerase I (TOPO1) led to the selection of irinotecan-based treatments in 48% (12/25) of the patients. A pooled analysis suggested clinical benefit in patients with high TOPO1 expression receiving irinotecan-based regimens (GMI ≥ 1.3 in 66.7% of cases). These results confirmed previous observations that MoMP increases the frequency of identifiable actionable alterations (92% of patients). The MoMP proposed allows the identification of biomarkers that are frequently expressed in MBCs and the evaluation of their role as predictors of response to commercially available agents. Lastly, this study confirmed the role of MoMP for informing treatment selection in refractory MBC patients: more than half of the enrolled patients reached a GMI ≥ 1.3 even after multiple lines of previous therapies for metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryIrinotecanProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeIrinotecanmetastatic breast cancermulti-omic molecular profilingprecision medicinerelational databaseTOPO1 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34437759
PMCPMC8732340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.