Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437657›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2021

SARS-CoV-2 suppresses IFNβ production mediated by NSP1, 5, 6, 15, ORF6 and ORF7b but does not suppress the effects of added interferon.

Maya Shemesh, Turgut E Aktepe, Joshua M Deerain, Julie L McAuley, Michelle D Audsley, Cassandra T David, Damian F J Purcell, Victoria Urin, Rune Hartmann, Gregory W Moseley and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SARS-CoV-2-derived RNA replicons as safe and effective vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maya ShemeshDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Turgut E AktepeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9725-4220
Joshua M DeerainDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julie L McAuleyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2493-3465
Michelle D AudsleyDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Cassandra T DavidDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Damian F J PurcellDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4485-1726
Victoria UrinDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5391-5659
Rune HartmannDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1159-066X
Gregory W MoseleyDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4516-3906
Jason M MackenzieDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-8350
Gideon SchreiberDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Daniel HarariDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0642-4157
The University of Melbourne · AUWeizmann Institute of Science · ILAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type I Interferons (IFN-Is) are a family of cytokines which play a major role in inhibiting viral infection. Resultantly, many viruses have evolved mechanisms in which to evade the IFN-I response. Here we tested the impact of expression of 27 different SARS-CoV-2 genes in relation to their effect on IFN production and activity using three independent experimental methods. We identified six gene products; NSP6, ORF6, ORF7b, NSP1, NSP5 and NSP15, which strongly (>10-fold) blocked MAVS-induced (but not TRIF-induced) IFNβ production. Expression of the first three of these SARS-CoV-2 genes specifically blocked MAVS-induced IFNβ-promoter activity, whereas all six genes induced a collapse in IFNβ mRNA levels, corresponding with suppressed IFNβ protein secretion. Five of these six genes furthermore suppressed MAVS-induced activation of IFNλs, however with no effect on IFNα or IFNγ production. In sharp contrast, SARS-CoV-2 infected cells remained extremely sensitive to anti-viral activity exerted by added IFN-Is. None of the SARS-CoV-2 genes were able to block IFN-I signaling, as demonstrated by robust activation of Interferon Stimulated Genes (ISGs) by added interferon. This, despite the reduced levels of STAT1 and phospho-STAT1, was likely caused by broad translation inhibition mediated by NSP1. Finally, we found that a truncated ORF7b variant that has arisen from a mutant SARS-CoV-2 strain harboring a 382-nucleotide deletion associating with mild disease (Δ382 strain identified in Singapore & Taiwan in 2020) lost its ability to suppress type I and type III IFN production. In summary, our findings support a multi-gene process in which SARS-CoV-2 blocks IFN-production, with ORF7b as a major player, presumably facilitating evasion of host detection during early infection. However, SARS-CoV-2 fails to suppress IFN-I signaling thus providing an opportunity to exploit IFN-Is as potential therapeutic antiviral drugs.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdaptor Proteins, Vesicular TransportAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2HEK293 CellsHumansInterferon-betaSARS-CoV-2STAT1 Transcription FactorVero CellsViral ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdaptor Proteins, Vesicular TransportEukaryotic Initiation Factor-2Interferon-betaMAVS protein, humanORF7b protein, SARS-CoV-2STAT1 protein, humanSTAT1 Transcription FactorTICAM1 protein, humanViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID34437657
PMCPMC8389490
OpenAlexW3196190359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.