Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437589›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Biosafety devices to control the spread of potentially contaminated dispersion particles. New associated strategies for health environments.

Victor Angelo Martins Montalli, Patrícia Rejane de Freitas, Milenna de Figueiredo Torres, Oscar de Figueiredo Torres Junior, Dienne Hellen Moutinho De Vilhena, José Luiz Cintra Junqueira, Marcelo Henrique Napimoga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Victor Angelo Martins MontalliFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas-SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1927-7718
Patrícia Rejane de FreitasFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Milenna de Figueiredo TorresFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Oscar de Figueiredo Torres JuniorUVCtec Company, São Paulo-SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-6556
Dienne Hellen Moutinho De VilhenaFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
José Luiz Cintra JunqueiraFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas-SP, Brazil.
Marcelo Henrique NapimogaFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas-SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental procedures produce a large amount of spatter and aerosols that create concern for the transmission of airborne diseases, such as Covid-19. This study established a methodology with the objective of evaluating new associated strategies to reduce the risk of cross-transmission in a health environment by simulating spread of potentially contaminated dispersion particles (PCDP) in the environment. This crossover study, was conducted in a school clinic environment (4 clinics containing 12 dental chairs each). As a positive control group (without barriers), 12 professionals activated at the same time the turbine of dental drill, for one minute, with a bacterial solution (Lactobacillus casei Shirota, 1.5x108 CFU/mL), which had been added in the cooling reservoir of the dental equipment. In the experimental groups, the professionals made use of; a) an individual biosafety barrier in dentistry (IBBD) which consists of a metal support covered by a disposable PVC film barrier; b) a Mobile Unit of Disinfection by Ultraviolet-C, consisting of 8 UV lamps-C of 95W, of 304μW/cm2 of irradiance each, connected for 15 minutes (UV-C) and; c) the association between the two methods (IBBD + UV-C). In each clinic, 56 Petri dishes containing MRS agar were positioned on the lamps, benches and on the floor. In addition, plates were placed prior to each test (negative control group) and plates were also placed in the corridor that connects the four clinics. In the groups without barrier and IBBD + UV-C the passive air microorganisms in Petri dishes was also evaluated at times of 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes after the end of the dental's drill activation. The mean (standard deviation) of CFU of L. casei Shirota for the positive control group was 3905 (1521), while in the experimental groups the mean using the IBBD was 940 (466) CFU, establishing a reduction on average, of 75% (p<0.0001). For the UV-C group, the mean was 260 (309) CFU and the association of the use of IBBD + UV-C promoted an overall average count of 152 (257) CFU, establishing a reduction on average of 93% and 96%, respectively (p<0.0001). Considering these results and the study model used, the individual biosafety barrier associated with UV-C technology showed to be efficient strategies to reduce the dispersion of bioaerosols generated in an environment with high rate of PCDP generation and may be an alternative for the improvement of biosafety in different healthy environment.

Indexed as

AerosolsAir MicrobiologyDental ClinicsDisinfectionHumansLacticaseibacillus caseiUltraviolet RaysAerosols

Identifiers

PMID34437589
PMCPMC8389494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.