Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437587›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

Elizabeth E Mmari, Eunice S Pallangyo, Athar Ali, Dereck A Kaale, Isaac H Mawalla, Muzdalifat S Abeid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth E MmariDepartment of General Surgery, The Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-110X
Eunice S PallangyoDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, The Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-361X
Athar AliDepartment of General Surgery, The Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0002-3999-8168
Dereck A KaaleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Saifee Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Isaac H MawallaDepartment of General Surgery, The Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muzdalifat S AbeidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Aga Khan University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical Site Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among operated patients. In spite of the accessibility of universal and national guidelines for surgical prophylaxis, recent studies surveying the present routine of prophylaxis have demonstrated overutilization of a wide range antibacterial medication for a single patient. Few studies have shown qualitatively factors influencing this and perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use. Unfortunately, none of these studies have been done in Tanzania.

objectiveTo describe the perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital.

methodsA qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with surgeons was conducted in English by the primary investigator. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Systematic text condensation by Malterud was used for data analysis.

findingsFourteen surgeons and obstetrics and gynaecologists participated. Their perceptions were summarized into three main categories: Inadequate data to support practice; one who sees the patient decides the antibiotic prophylaxis; prolonged antibiotic use for fear of unknown. The participants perceived that choice of antibiotic should be based on local hospital data for bacterial resistance pattern, however the hospital guidelines and data for surgical site infection rates are unknown. Fear of getting infection and anticipating complications led to prolonged antibiotics use.

conclusionThe study provides an understanding of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use and its implementation challenges. This was partly expressed by unavailability of local data and guidelines to enhance practice. To improve this, there is a need of guidelines that incorporates local resistance surveillance data and enhanced antibiotic stewardship programmes. A strong consideration should be placed into ways to combat the fears of surgeons for complications, as these significantly affect the current practise with use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntimicrobial StewardshipClinical CompetenceFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'SurgeonsSurgical Wound InfectionSurveys and QuestionnairesTanzaniaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34437587
PMCPMC8389451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.