Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437583›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Children's vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress.

Connor J Haggarty, Paula D Trotter, Francis McGlone, Susannah C Walker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Centrality of Touch Avoidance in Social Touch Experiences in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Connor J HaggartyResearch Centre for Brain & Behaviour, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6678-0570
Paula D TrotterResearch Centre for Brain & Behaviour, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Francis McGloneResearch Centre for Brain & Behaviour, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Susannah C WalkerResearch Centre for Brain & Behaviour, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8919-3544
Liverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective sharing is a bottom-up process involving automatic processing of sensory inputs that facilitate vicarious experience of another's emotional state. It is grounded directly in the prior experiences of the perceiver. In adults, vicarious ratings of affective touch match the known velocity tuning and hypothesised anatomical distribution of C-tactile afferents (CT), a subclass of C-fibre which respond preferentially to low force/velocity stroking touch, typically perceived as pleasant. Given the centrality of touch to early nurturing interactions, here we examined whether primary school aged children's vicarious ratings of affective touch show the same anatomical and velocity specific patterns reported in adults. Forty-four children aged between 8 and 11 (mean age 9, 24 male) rated a sequence of video clips depicting one individual being touched by another on 5 different upper-body sites (palm, dorsal forearm, ventral forearm, upper-arm and back) at 3 different velocities (static, CT optimal, slow stroking and non-CT optimal, fast stroking). Immediately after viewing each clip, participants were asked to rate how pleasant they perceived the touch to be. While children rated the CT optimal velocity significantly higher than static or non-CT optimal touch, unlike adults their ratings did not vary across skin sites. This difference may reflect the fact children's ratings are grounded in bottom-up affective resonance while adults also draw on top-down cognitive evaluation of the broader social context when rating the stimuli.

Indexed as

Skin Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentChildCognitionEmotionsFemaleForearmHandHumansMaleNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedPhysical StimulationPsychophysicsSocial BehaviorTouchTouch Perception

Identifiers

PMID34437583
PMCPMC8389448
OpenAlexW3162384178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.