Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437471›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2021

Natural Products against Sand Fly Vectors of Leishmaniosis: A Systematic Review.

Michela Pugliese, Gabriella Gaglio, Annamaria Passantino, Emanuele Brianti, Ettore Napoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Iridoids fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Insecticidal Activity ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michela PuglieseDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, ME, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0440-5457
Gabriella GaglioDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, ME, Italy.
Annamaria PassantinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, ME, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-3636
Emanuele BriantiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, ME, Italy.
Ettore NapoliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, 98168 Messina, ME, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leishmaniosis is a vector-borne disease transmitted to animals and humans by the bite of blood-sucking phlebotomine sand flies. These small insects play a crucial role in the diffusion of the disease. To date, the sole strategy recognized for the prevention of leishmaniosis is the use of topical repellent compounds against sand fly bites. Several synthetic insecticides and repellents have been developed; however, the wide and unprejudiced use of these formulations have led to the loss of their effectiveness and the development of resistance phenomena. Moreover, some of these synthetic repellents have severe detrimental effects on the environment and could represent a serious threat to both animal and human health. Recently, an increased interest in the research on alternative approaches to sand fly control has been expressed. In this study, we systematically reviewed the efforts of the scientific community to individuate a phytochemical alternative for the control of sand fly species recognized as vectors of

Indexed as

natural productsplant-based productsrepellencesand flyvector borne diseasesvectors

Identifiers

PMID34437471
PMCPMC8402801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.