Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34437455›Full record

ArticleToxins2021

Human-Relevant Sensitivity of iPSC-Derived Human Motor Neurons to BoNT/A1 and B1.

Maren Schenke, Hélène-Christine Prause, Wiebke Bergforth, Adina Przykopanski, Andreas Rummel, Frank Klawonn, Bettina Seeger

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maren SchenkeInstitute for Food Quality and Safety, Research Group Food Toxicology and Alternative/Complementary Methods to Animal Experiments, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5649-591X
Hélène-Christine PrauseInstitute for Food Quality and Safety, Research Group Food Toxicology and Alternative/Complementary Methods to Animal Experiments, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Wiebke BergforthInstitute for Food Quality and Safety, Research Group Food Toxicology and Alternative/Complementary Methods to Animal Experiments, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
Adina PrzykopanskiInstitut für Toxikologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Andreas RummelInstitut für Toxikologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-1641
Frank KlawonnBiostatistics Research Group, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9613-182X
Bettina SeegerInstitute for Food Quality and Safety, Research Group Food Toxicology and Alternative/Complementary Methods to Animal Experiments, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, 30173 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4653-2841
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEOstfalia University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) for medical treatments necessitates a potency quantification of these lethal bacterial toxins, resulting in the use of a large number of test animals. Available alternative methods are limited in their relevance, as they are based on rodent cells or neuroblastoma cell lines or applicable for single toxin serotypes only. Here, human motor neurons (MNs), which are the physiological target of BoNTs, were generated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and compared to the neuroblastoma cell line SiMa, which is often used in cell-based assays for BoNT potency determination. In comparison with the mouse bioassay, human MNs exhibit a superior sensitivity to the BoNT serotypes A1 and B1 at levels that are reflective of human sensitivity. SiMa cells were able to detect BoNT/A1, but with much lower sensitivity than human MNs and appear unsuitable to detect any BoNT/B1 activity. The MNs used for these experiments were generated according to three differentiation protocols, which resulted in distinct sensitivity levels. Molecular parameters such as receptor protein concentration and electrical activity of the MNs were analyzed, but are not predictive for BoNT sensitivity. These results show that human MNs from several sources should be considered in BoNT testing and that human MNs are a physiologically relevant model, which could be used to optimize current BoNT potency testing.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesBiological AssayBotulinum Toxins, Type ACell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceMotor NeuronsNeuroblastomaTumor Cells, CulturedBotulinum Toxins, Type Aalternative methodsbotulinum neurotoxinsin vitro potency determinationmotor neurons

Identifiers

PMID34437455
PMCPMC8402508
OpenAlexW3196278405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.