ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2022
Reverberation Clutter Suppression Using 2-D Spatial Coherence Analysis.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unsupervised Beamforming with Optimized Coherence Loss for Clutter Suppression in Single Plane-Wave Ultrasound Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Null subtraction imaging combined with modified delay multiply-and-sum beamforming for coherent plane-wave compounding.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Adaptive Models for Multi-Covariate Imaging of Sub-Resolution Targets (MIST).IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
- Spatial Coherence in Medical Ultrasound: A Review.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2022Review
- Spatiotemporal Coherence to Quantify Sources of Image Degradation in Ultrasonic Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Diffuse reverberation clutter often significantly degrades the visibility of abdominal structures. Reverberation clutter acts as a temporally stationary haze that originates from the multiple scattering within the subcutaneous layers and has a narrow spatial correlation length. We recently presented an adaptive beamforming technique, Lag-one Spatial Coherence Adaptive Normalization (LoSCAN), which can recover the contrast suppressed by incoherent noise. LoSCAN successfully suppressed reverberation clutter in numerous clinical examples. However, reverberation clutter is a 3-D phenomenon and can often exhibit a finite partial correlation between receive channels. Due to a strict noise-incoherence assumption, LoSCAN does not eliminate correlated reverberation clutter. This work presents a 2-D matrix array-based LoSCAN method and evaluates matrix-LoSCAN-based strategies to suppress partially correlated reverberation clutter. We validated the proposed matrix LoSCAN method using Field II simulations of a 64×64 symmetric 2-D array. We show that a subaperture beamforming (SAB) method tuned to the direction of noise correlation is an effective method to enhance LoSCAN's performance. We evaluated the efficacy of the proposed methods using fundamental and harmonic channel data acquired from the liver of two healthy volunteers using a 64×16 custom 2-D array. Compared to azimuthal LoSCAN, the proposed approach increased the contrast by up to 5.5 dB and the generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) by up to 0.07. We also present analytic models to understand the impact of partially correlated reverberation clutter on LoSCAN images and explain the proposed methods' mechanism of image quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.