Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436699›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2022

Drug-induced colitis on BRAF and MEK inhibitors for BRAF V600E-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a case report.

Francesco Gelsomino, Alessandro Di Federico, Maria Lucia Tardio, Giada Grilli, Antonietta D'Errico, Andrea Ardizzoni, Stefania Salvagni

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. RAS/MAPK inhibition in pediatric gliomas.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. RAF and MEK Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco GelsominoMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. francesco_gelsomino@aosp.bo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9204-1728
Alessandro Di FedericoMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Lucia TardioAnatomy and Histopathology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giada GrilliMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Antonietta D'ErricoDepartment of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea ArdizzoniMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefania SalvagniMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Azienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has deeply changed the treatment of BRAF V600-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients. These agents demonstrated high antitumor activity as well as safe and manageable toxicity profile. Hypertension, pyrexia and increased liver enzymes are the most common adverse events. Gastrointestinal toxicities are rare, and mainly consist of mild grade vomiting and diarrhea. CASE REPORT: We report the case of 70-year-old man affected by BRAF V600-mutant NSCLC with bilateral lung and bone metastases. First-line treatment with encorafenib (450 mg once daily) and binimetinib (45 mg twice daily) was administered within a clinical trial. At the first radiological assessment, computed tomography (CT) scan showed a partial response and signs of intestinal inflammation were reported. The investigational treatment was timely withheld. The subsequent colonoscopy demonstrated the presence of ulcerative lesions at the caecal tract, and the histological diagnosis suggested a drug-induced colitis. No specific treatment was given as the patient did not report abdominal disturbances. Forty-five days after treatment interruption a new CT scan showed the resolution of bowel inflammation and investigational treatment was resumed at the same doses. The patient is still alive and free of toxicity recurrence after 11 months from treatment initiation. Conclusion. Severe gastrointestinal toxicities are uncommon with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, although cases of colitis and intestinal perforation have already been reported in literature. The pathogenesis seems to be related to the MAPK pathway inhibition performed by MEK inhibitors. These adverse events should be accounted given the potential to evolve into life-threatening conditions.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesCarbamatesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungColitisHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesAntineoplastic AgentsBenzimidazolesbinimetinibBRAF protein, humanCarbamatesencorafenibMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesBRAFColitisGastrointestinal toxicityMEKNon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID34436699
PMCPMC8763820
OpenAlexW3193771196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.