Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436684›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2021

Joint effusion, anteroposterior stability, muscle strength and degree of patellofemoral osteoarthritis significantly impact outcome following revision ACL reconstruction.

Kathleen Andrä, Enes Kayaalp, Robert Prill, Lars Irlenbusch, Eckehard Liesaus, Tilo Trommer, Peter Ullmann, Roland Becker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Time to focus on ACL revision: ESSKA 2022 consensus.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  4. Shaping experimental orthopaedics.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathleen AndräCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Brandenburg, Medical School "Theodor Fontane", Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Enes KayaalpDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Siraselviler Cad. 34433 Beyoglu, Istanbul, Turkey.
Robert PrillCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Brandenburg, Medical School "Theodor Fontane", Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
Lars IrlenbuschSports Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Eckehard LiesausSports Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Tilo TrommerSports Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Peter UllmannSports Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Roland BeckerCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Brandenburg, Medical School "Theodor Fontane", Hochstrasse 29, 14770, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany. Roland.Becker@mhb-fontane.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-7608

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEffusion, impaired muscle function and knee instability are considered as some of the most important factors effecting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) but the impact on revision ACL-R remains unclear. It was hypothesized that these factors will significantly worsen clinical outcome following revision ACL-R.

methodsSeventy knees (13 female and 57 male) were followed retrospectively after revision ACL-R at a mean follow-up of 47.8 ± 20.7 months. Clinical examination was based on the International Knee Documentation Evaluation Form-2000 (IKDC), Tegner activity scale. Instrumented measurement of anterior tibial translation was performed using the Rolimeter® (DJO Global, Freiburg, Germany). Bilateral circumference of the thigh was measured 10 and 20 cm proximal to the medial joint space. Cartilage was assessed according to Outerbridge classification during both primary and revision ACL-R.

resultsTegner activity scale decreased significantly from 7.8 ± 1.4 points at primary ACL-R to 7 ± 1.8 points at revision ACL-R, and 5.8 ± 1.7 points at the time of follow up (p < 0.001). Joint effusion (r = - 0.47, p < 0.01) and side to side differences in single leg hop test (r = - 0.48, p < 0.1) significantly correlated with inferior outcome. Cartilage lesions were found in 67% of the patients at the time of revision ACL-R compared to 38% at the time of primary ACL-R. According to the IKDC classification A was graded in three patients (4.3%), B in 35 (50%), C in 29 (41.4%) and D in three (4.3%). Joint effusion was measured in 35% of patients at the time of follow-up. Degeneration at the patellofemoral compartment of > grad 2 was responsible for IKDC grade C and D (p = 0.035). Instrumented anteroposterior site-to-site difference of ≥3 mm showed significant impact on clinical outcome (p < 0.019).

conclusionThe study has shown that chronic effusion, quadriceps dysfunction, cartilage lesions especially at the patellofemoral compartment and side to side difference in anteroposterior stability significantly influences patient outcome after revision ACL-R. These factors require special attention when predicting patient's outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-IV, case-controlled study.

Indexed as

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionEffusionIKDCInstabilityQuadricepsRevisionTegner activity scale

Identifiers

PMID34436684
PMCPMC8390615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.