Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436669›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Compositional profile of mucosal bacteriome of smokers and smokeless tobacco users.

Divya Gopinath, Chong Chun Wie, Moinak Banerjee, Lakshmi Thangavelu, Pradeep Kumar R, Deepak Nallaswamy, Michael George Botelho, Newell W Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Divya GopinathFaculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Street 34 Hospital Rd, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Chong Chun WieSchool of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Moinak BanerjeeHuman Molecular Genetics Lab, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, India.
Lakshmi ThangaveluSaveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Pradeep Kumar RSaveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Deepak NallaswamySaveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Michael George BotelhoFaculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Street 34 Hospital Rd, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, SAR, China. botelho@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-4716
Newell W JohnsonFaculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, Street 34 Hospital Rd, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, SAR, China. n.johnson@griffith.edu.au.
Saveetha University · INPrince Philip Dental Hospital · CNGriffith University · AUMonash University Malaysia · MYRajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmoked, and especially smokeless, tobacco are major causes of oral cancer globally. Here, we examine the oral bacteriome of smokers and of smokeless tobacco users, in comparison to healthy controls, using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

methodsOral swab samples were collected from smokers, smokeless tobacco users, and healthy controls (n = 44). Microbial DNA was extracted and the 16S rRNA gene profiled using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Sequencing reads were processed using DADA2, and taxonomical classification was performed using the phylogenetic placement method. Differentially abundant taxa were identified using DESeq2, while functional metagenomes based on KEGG orthology abundance were inferred using LIMMA.

resultsA significantly higher microbial diversity was observed in smokeless tobacco users and smokers relative to controls (P < 0.05). Compositional differences in microbial communities were observed in all comparisons with healthy controls (PERMANOVA P < 0.05) but not between smokers and smokeless tobacco users. Levels of Fusobacterium spp., Saccharibacterium spp., and members of Shuttleworthia were elevated in smokers when compared to controls (BH adj P < 0.01). In addition, the relative abundance of three bacterial taxa belonging to genera Fusobacterium spp., Catonella, and Fretibacterium spp. was significantly increased in smokeless tobacco users relative to controls (BH adj P < 0.01). Major functional pathways significantly increased in smokeless tobacco users relative to both controls, and smokers were similar and involved amino acid metabolism including glutamate and aspartate biosynthesis and degradation (log FC > 1.5; BH adj P < 0.01).

conclusionsA distinct taxonomic and functional profile of oral microbiome in smokers and smokeless tobacco users as compared to healthy controls implicates a significant role of microbes and their metabolites in diseases associated with tobacco use including oral cancer. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Future efforts in preventive, diagnostic, curative, and prognostic strategies for diseases associated with tobacco use in smokers and smokeless tobacco users could incorporate the oral microbiome.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaTobacco, SmokelessBacteriaHumansMouth MucosaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSmokersTobacco UseRNA, Ribosomal, 16SMicrobiomeMicrobiotaOral microbiomeSmokeless tobaccoSmokingTobacco

Identifiers

PMID34436669
OpenAlexW3193611406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.