ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021
Reliability of phenotype estimation and extended classification of ancestry using decedent samples.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Forensic DNA phenotyping: a review on SNP panels, genotyping techniques, and prediction models.Forensic sciences research · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Eye and Hair Color Prediction in Mexican Mestizos from Monterrey City Based on ForenSeqGenes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Illumina® MiSeq FGx™, in conjunction with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep kit, produces genotypes of the CODIS-required short tandem repeats and provides phenotype and biogeographical ancestry estimations via phenotype-informative and ancestry-informative markers, respectively. Although both markers have been validated for use in forensic biology, there is little data to determine the practical utility of these estimations to assist in identifying missing persons using decedent casework samples. The accuracy and utility of phenotypic and ancestral estimations were investigated for 300 samples received by the Los Angeles County Department of Medical Examiner-Coroner. piSNP genotypes were translated into hair and eye colors using the Forenseq™ Universal Analysis Software (UAS) on the MiSeq FGx™ and the HIrisPlex System, and statistical accuracy was evaluated in context with the reported decedent characteristics. Similarly, estimates of each decedent's biogeographical ancestry were compared to assess the efficacy of these markers to predict ancestry correctly. The average UAS and the HIrisPlex system prediction accuracy for brown and blue eyes were 95.3% and 96.2%, respectively. Intermediate eye color could not be predicted with high accuracy using either system. Other than the black hair phenotype reporting an accuracy that exceeded 90% using either system, hair color was also too variable to be predicted with high accuracy. The FROG-kb database distinguishes decedents adequately beyond the Asian, African, European, and Admixed American global ancestries provided by the MiSeq FGx™ UAS PCA plots. FROG-kb correctly identified Middle Eastern, Pacific Islander, Latin American, or Jewish ancestries with accuracies of 70.0%, 81.8%, 73.8%, and 86.7%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34436656What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.