Trial reportJAMA oncology2021
Effect of Cisplatin and Gemcitabine With or Without Berzosertib in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02567409 (A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine With or Without M6620), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine With or Without M6620 (VX-970) in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of ATR inhibitors in the treatment of solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Order of patient entry and outcomes in phase II clinical trials: A meta-analysis of individual patient data.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Pooled it
- A Phase II Study of Berzosertib in Combination with Carboplatin Compared with Docetaxel with Carboplatin in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2026Trial
- Synthetic lethality in cancer: mechanisms, therapeutic exploitation and clinical translation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- ATR inhibitors synergise with mitomycin C to enhance cytotoxicity in patient-derived non-muscle invasive bladder cancer organoids.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of aminopyrazine-based ATR/HDACs dual inhibitors.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Phase Ib study of berzosertib, carboplatin, gemcitabine, and pembrolizumab in patients with squamous nonsmall lung cancer (ETCTN 10313).The oncologist · 2025Article
- Article
- The ATR Inhibitor Elimusertib in Combination with Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A California Cancer Consortium Phase I Trial (NCI 10404).Cancer research communications · 2025Article
- Comparative in vivo toxicology of ATR inhibitors ceralasertib, elimusertib, and berzosertib alone and in combination with ionizing radiation.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2025Article
- The leading role of MYC in DNA damage response: exploring opportunities for therapeutic inhibition.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Impact of DNA Repair Deficiency in the Evolving Treatment Landscape of Bladder Cancer.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- Non-linear IV pharmacokinetics of the ATR inhibitor berzosertib (M6620) in mice.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2024Article
- Targeting ATR in patients with cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Key Proteins of Replication Stress Response and Cell Cycle Control as Cancer Therapy Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- New insights into ATR inhibition in muscle invasive bladder cancer: The role of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic subunit 3B.Oncology research · 2024Article
- ATM deficiency confers specific therapeutic vulnerabilities in bladder cancer.Science advances · 2023Article
- Unleashing the Power of Synthetic Lethality: Augmenting Treatment Efficacy through Synergistic Integration with Chemotherapy Drugs.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Targeting Replication Stress and Chemotherapy Resistance with a Combination of Sacituzumab Govitecan and Berzosertib: A Phase I Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Article
- VE-822 upregulates the deubiquitinase OTUD1 to stabilize FHL1 to inhibit the progression of lung adenocarcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importancePreclinical studies suggest that inhibition of single-stranded DNA repair by ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 (ATR) may enhance the cytotoxicity of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and other chemotherapeutic agents. Cisplatin with gemcitabine remains the standard up-front therapy for treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer.
objectiveTo determine whether the use of the selective ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, could augment the activity of cisplatin with gemcitabine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsIn a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, 87 patients across 23 centers in the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network were randomized to receive either cisplatin with gemcitabine alone (control arm) or cisplatin with gemcitabine plus berzosertib (experimental arm). Key eligibility criteria included confirmed metastatic urothelial cancer, no prior cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease, 12 months or more since perioperative therapy, and eligibility for cisplatin receipt based on standard criteria. The study was conducted from January 27, 2017, to December 15, 2020.
interventionsIn the control arm, cisplatin, 70 mg/m2, was given on day 1 and gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2, was given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In the experimental arm, cisplatin, 60 mg/m2, was given on day 1; gemcitabine, 875 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8; and berzosertib, 90 mg/m2, on days 2 and 9 of a 21-day cycle. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival. The analysis was on all patients who started therapy.
resultsOf the total of 87 patients randomized, 41 patients received cisplatin with gemcitabine alone and 46 received cisplatin with gemcitabine plus berzosertib. Median age was 67 (range, 32-84) years, and 68 patients (78%) were men. Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months for both arms (Bajorin risk-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.72-2.08). Median overall survival was shorter with cisplatin with gemcitabine plus berzosertib compared with cisplatin with gemcitabine alone (14.4 vs 19.8 months; Bajorin risk-adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.76-2.68). Higher rates of grade 3 vs grade 4 thrombocytopenia (59% vs 39%) and neutropenia (37% vs 27%) were observed with cisplatin with gemcitabine and berzosertib compared with cisplatin with gemcitabine alone; consequently, more dose reductions were needed in the experimental arm. Patients in the experimental arm received a median cisplatin dose of 250 mg/m2, which was significantly lower than the median dose of 370 mg/m2 in the control arm (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The addition of berzosertib to cisplatin with gemcitabine did not prolong progression-free survival relative to cisplatin with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer, and a trend toward inferior survival was observed with this combination. Berzosertib plus cisplatin with gemcitabine was associated with significantly higher hematologic toxicities despite attenuated dosing of cisplatin with gemcitabine.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02567409.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.