Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436462›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2021

Enantioselective Quantification of Amphetamine and Metabolites in Serum Samples: Forensic Evaluation and Estimation of Consumption Time.

Moritz Losacker, Michael Kraemer, Alexandra Philipsen, Kristina Duecker, Nadine Dreimueller, Jan Engelmann, Joerg Roehrich, Cornelius Hess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Moritz LosackerDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Am Pulverturm 3, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-1512
Michael KraemerDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Stiftsplatz 12, D-53111 Bonn, Germany.
Alexandra PhilipsenClinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Kristina DueckerClinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Nadine DreimuellerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Jan EngelmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Joerg RoehrichDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Am Pulverturm 3, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Cornelius HessDepartment of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Legal Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Am Pulverturm 3, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In forensic toxicology, amphetamine intoxications represent one of the most common case groups and present difficult questions for toxicologists. Estimating the time of consumption and the current influence of the stimulant is particularly difficult when only total amphetamine concentrations are considered. Stereoselective analysis and the consideration of metabolites can provide valuable information to facilitate interpretation. An enantioselective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for detection of amphetamine, norephedrine and 4-hydroxyamphetamine was developed. Validation showed satisfactory selectivity, sensitivity, linearity (0.5-250 ng/mL), precision and accuracy for all enantiomers. The method was applied to a collective of 425 forensic serum samples and 30 serum samples from psychiatric inpatients stating their last time of amphetamine consumption. Norephedrine and 4-hydroxyamphetamine were detected more frequently at higher amphetamine concentrations and at lower amphetamine (R)/(S) concentration ratios, possibly indicating recent consumption. Mean (R)/(S) ratio of amphetamine was 1.14, whereas higher ratios (mean 1.36) were found for amphetamine concentrations below 100 ng/mL. The (R)/(S) ratios of psychiatric inpatients significantly correlated with the reported time intervals to last consumption. The use of amphetamine (R)/(S) ratios and the simultaneous detection of metabolites are promising factors that can facilitate estimation of consumption time and current impairment.

Indexed as

amphetamineblood serumchiral chromatographyconsumption timedriving under the influence of drugs (DUID)enantiomersforensic scienceliquid chromatographymass spectrometrystereoselective

Identifiers

PMID34436462
PMCPMC8400571
OpenAlexW3188857663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.