Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34436228›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2021

Alternative Approach for Cerebral Protection during Complex Aortic Arch and Redo Surgery.

Massimo Capoccia, Christoph A Nienaber, Maziar Mireskandari, Michael Sabetai, Christopher Young, Nicholas J Cheshire, Ulrich P Rosendahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Massimo CapocciaAortic Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Christoph A NienaberAortic Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Maziar MireskandariAortic Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Michael SabetaiCardiac Surgery, Guy's & St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 9RS, UK.
Christopher YoungCardiac Surgery, Guy's & St. Thomas' Hospital, London SE1 9RS, UK.
Nicholas J CheshireAortic Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Ulrich P RosendahlAortic Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total arch replacement remains a very demanding surgical procedure. It can be associated with reasonable long-term outcomes but carries serious perioperative complications. Aortic arch surgery has progressed in recent years to a wider adoption of reproducible and reliable techniques. Conventional open, surgical aortic arch replacement is currently offered to the majority of patients, although hybrid and wholly endovascular techniques are gaining popularity. With regards to open arch replacement, the nuances of surgical technique, the mode of cannulation and the optimal cerebral protection protocols remain a matter of debate. We propose an alternative cannulation approach facilitated by the cooperation between cardiac and vascular surgeons. A three-way arterial cannulation including both carotid arteries and the femoral artery (or ascending aorta) is the key feature of this approach. A case series of complex patients is presented to show both the feasibility and relative safety of a standardised new approach with a 100% technical success rate and a 16% 30-day mortality. The three-way cannulation approach may have a role to play for complex and extensive procedures requiring prolonged cerebral protection. We believe that a shared skill set from cardiac and vascular specialists is essential for the safe management and successful outcomes using this adaptive technique.

Indexed as

arch surgerycerebral protectionredo surgery

Identifiers

PMID34436228
PMCPMC8396903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.